Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306617›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2022

Locus Coeruleus magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between native-space and template-space approach.

F S Giorgi, N Martini, F Lombardo, A Galgani, L Bastiani, D Della Latta, H Hlavata, C L Busceti, F Biagioni, S Puglisi-Allegra and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daily heart rate variability biofeedback training decreases locus coeruleus MRI contrast in younger adults in a randomized clinical trial.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

F S GiorgiDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. filippo.giorgi@unipi.it.
N Martini *Deep Health Unit, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, CNR-Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
F LombardoCardiovascular and Neuroradiological Multimodal Imaging Unit, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, CNR-Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
A GalganiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
L BastianiInstitute of Clinical Physiology of National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
D Della LattaDeep Health Unit, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, CNR-Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
H HlavataCardiovascular and Neuroradiological Multimodal Imaging Unit, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, CNR-Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
C L BuscetiIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
F BiagioniIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
S Puglisi-AllegraIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
N PaveseClinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
F FornaiDepartment of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. francesco.fornai@neuromed.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-5084
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAarhus University · DKIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locus Coeruleus (LC) is the main noradrenergic nucleus of the brain, which is involved in many physiological functions including cognition; its impairment may be crucial in the neurobiology of a variety of brain diseases. Locus Coeruleus-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (LC-MRI) allows to identify in vivo LC in humans. Thus, a variety of research teams have been using LC-MRI to estimate LC integrity in normal aging and in patients affected by neurodegenerative disorders, where LC integrity my work as a biomarker. A number of variations between LC-MRI studies exist, concerning post-acquisition analysis and whether this had been performed within MRI native space or in ad hoc-built MRI template space. Moreover, the reproducibility and reliability of this tool is still to be explored. Therefore, in the present study, we analyzed a group of neurologically healthy, cognitively intact elderly subjects, using both a native space- and a template space-based LC-MRI analysis. We found a good inter-method agreement, particularly considering the LC Contrast Ratio. The template space-based approach provided a higher spatial resolution, lower operator-dependency, and allowed the analysis of LC topography. Our ad hoc-developed LC template showed LC morphological data that were in line with templates published very recently. Remarkably, present data significantly overlapped with a recently published LC "metaMask", that had been obtained by averaging the results of a variety of previous LC-MRI studies. Thus, such a template space-based approach may pave the way to a standardized LC-MRI analysis and to be used in future clinic-anatomical correlations.

Indexed as

Locus CoeruleusMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAgingHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyReproducibility of ResultsAgingBiormarkerLocus CoeruleusMagnetic resonance imagingNoradrenaline

Identifiers

PMID35306617
PMCPMC9007774
OpenAlexW4221097798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.