Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306525›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Affinity2Vec: drug-target binding affinity prediction through representation learning, graph mining, and machine learning.

Maha A Thafar, Mona Alshahrani, Somayah Albaradei, Takashi Gojobori, Magbubah Essack, Xin Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GSF-DTA: An Innovative Graph-Sequence Fusion Framework for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. DrugForm-DTA: Towards real-world drug-target binding affinity model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maha A ThafarComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Mona AlshahraniNational Center for Artificial Intelligence (NCAI), Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Somayah AlbaradeiComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Takashi GojoboriComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Magbubah EssackComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. magbubah.essack@kaust.edu.sa.
Xin GaoComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering (CEMSE) Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. xin.gao@kaust.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction plays a crucial role in drug repositioning and virtual drug screening. Most DTI prediction methods cast the problem as a binary classification task to predict if interactions exist or as a regression task to predict continuous values that indicate a drug's ability to bind to a specific target. The regression-based methods provide insight beyond the binary relationship. However, most of these methods require the three-dimensional (3D) structural information of targets which are still not generally available to the targets. Despite this bottleneck, only a few methods address the drug-target binding affinity (DTBA) problem from a non-structure-based approach to avoid the 3D structure limitations. Here we propose Affinity2Vec, as a novel regression-based method that formulates the entire task as a graph-based problem. To develop this method, we constructed a weighted heterogeneous graph that integrates data from several sources, including drug-drug similarity, target-target similarity, and drug-target binding affinities. Affinity2Vec further combines several computational techniques from feature representation learning, graph mining, and machine learning to generate or extract features, build the model, and predict the binding affinity between the drug and the target with no 3D structural data. We conducted extensive experiments to evaluate and demonstrate the robustness and efficiency of the proposed method on benchmark datasets used in state-of-the-art non-structured-based drug-target binding affinity studies. Affinity2Vec showed superior and competitive results compared to the state-of-the-art methods based on several evaluation metrics, including mean squared error, rm2, concordance index, and area under the precision-recall curve.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentMachine LearningDrug Repositioning

Identifiers

PMID35306525
PMCPMC8934358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.