Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A resonant cavity system for exposing cell cultures to intense pulsed RF fields.

Masood Ur-Rehman, Yasir Alfadhl, Xiaodong Chen, Rachel Whiting, Alex Wright, Christopher D Lindsay, John Tattersall, Iain Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masood Ur-RehmanJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK. masood.urrehman@glasgow.ac.uk.
Yasir AlfadhlSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, England, UK.
Xiaodong ChenSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, England, UK. xiaodong.chen@qmul.ac.uk.
Rachel WhitingChemical, Biological and Radiological Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, Wiltshire, UK.
Alex WrightChemical, Biological and Radiological Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, Wiltshire, UK.
Christopher D LindsayChemical, Biological and Radiological Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, Wiltshire, UK.
John TattersallChemical, Biological and Radiological Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, Wiltshire, UK.
Iain ScottChemical, Biological and Radiological Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, Wiltshire, UK.
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The IEEE and ICNIRP had specified a maximum permissible exposure for instantaneous peak electric field of 100 kV/m. However, no rationale was given for this limit. A novel exposure system was designed through a detailed process of analytical analysis, numerical modelling and prototype testing. The system consists of a cylindrical re-entrant resonant cavity that can achieve an electric field strength of more than 100 kV/m with an input power of 200 W. The working of the system was evaluated in simulation and experiment in terms of scattering parameters, electric field distributions and specific absorption rate. The system was then used to carry out in-vitro exposures of a human lymphoid cell line (GG0257) to a 1195 MHz signal at 53 dBm peak power and a pulse width of 550 ns at a range of interpulse intervals to identify heating-induced changes in cell viability. The proposed system offers high Q value of 5920 in unloaded condition which was reduced to 57 when loaded with 12 ml of cell culture but still offering 67 kV/m of the field intensity. Using the system for the exposure of GG0257 cells lasting 18 min, interpulse intervals of 11 μs or less caused a reduction in the number of viable cells and a corresponding increase in necrotic cells. For a shorter exposure duration of 6 min, the reduction in cell viability was seen at interpulse intervals of 5.5 μs or less. The designed exposure system is well capable of handling high intensity electric fields. Temperature measurements with a fibre optic probe and temperature sensitive labels showed that changes in viability were associated with temperature increases above 46 °C. This novel exposure system is an efficient means to investigate the possible relationship between peak field intensity and biological effects to provide a rationale behind the maximum exposure limit of 100 kV/m.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesElectricityCell SurvivalComputer SimulationElectromagnetic FieldsHumansTemperature

Identifiers

PMID35306515
PMCPMC8934360
OpenAlexW4220799707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.