ArticleScientific reports2022
Investigating the microbial and metalloprotease sequestration properties of superabsorbent wound dressings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-guided nanozyme engineering for chronic wound healing: from rational design to precision therapeutics.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Nanotechnological Antibacterial and Conductive Wound Dressings for Pressure Ulcer Prevention.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Modification of Superabsorbent Polymer Granules and Fibers for Antimicrobial Efficacy and Malodor Control.ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exudate production is a natural part of the wound healing process, however levels of exudate need to be appropriately managed to maintain a moist wound environment which supports healing. An overly-exuding wound creates an environment favourable to bacterial growth. In recent years, a significant increase in commercially available superabsorbent dressings have become available which claim to absorb and retain excess exudate and its components. However, the effectiveness of these dressings in sequestering and retaining bacteria and host-derived proteins has not been compared. We have therefore investigated several superabsorbent dressings for their ability to absorb and retain bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), their impact on bacterial viability, and their ability to sequester matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and 9 over 7 days. Whilst all dressings could sequester bacteria, some dressings internalised bacteria more effectively. There was considerable variation in bacterial viability within the dressings' core, as well as differences in bacterial retention. Some dressings effectively internalised and retained bacteria over time, whereas other dressings retained significantly less. These differences were reflected visually using scanning electron microscopy. Most dressings fully sequestered MMP-2 and 9. These data illustrate differences in the ability of superabsorbent dressings to absorb and retain exudate and its components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.