Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306465›Full record

ArticleWaste management (New York, N.Y.)2022

Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash co-disposal: Influence on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) concentration in landfill leachate.

Yalan Liu, Paola Mendoza-Perilla, Kyle A Clavier, Thabet M Tolaymat, John A Bowden, Helena M Solo-Gabriele, Timothy G Townsend

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Waste management (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Study on cultivation of aerobic granular sludge and its application in degrading lignin models in the sequencing batch biofilter granular reactor.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yalan LiuUniversity of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Paola Mendoza-PerillaUniversity of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Kyle A ClavierUniversity of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Thabet M TolaymatUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
John A BowdenUniversity of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; University of Florida, Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology & Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Helena M Solo-GabrieleUniversity of Miami, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
Timothy G TownsendUniversity of Florida, Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, College of Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Electronic address: ttown@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash is often managed through co-disposal with unburned wastes in landfills, a practice previously reported to result in enhanced leaching of pollutants (e.g., heavy metals) in landfill leachate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of co-disposed unburned wastes on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in MSWI ash landfill leachate. Leachate was collected from four landfills containing MSWI ash, either as a sole waste stream or co-disposed of with sewage sludge and MSW screenings. Samples of ash and unburned materials were collected and assessed separately for leachable PFAS in the laboratory. All samples were analyzed for 26 PFAS. Results showed that greater ash content was associated with lower leachate PFAS concentrations. The pure ash monofill exhibited the lowest PFAS in landfill leachate (290 ng L

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsRefuse DisposalWater Pollutants, ChemicalCoal AshIncinerationSewageSolid WasteWaste Disposal FacilitiesCoal AshFluorocarbonsSewageSolid WasteWater Pollutants, ChemicalCo-disposalLandfill LeachateLC-MS/MSMonofillMSWI AshPFAS

Identifiers

PMID35306465
PMCPMC10536760
OpenAlexW4220818181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.