Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306261›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2022

Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Prevention of Abdominal Adhesions: A Scoping Review.

Samuel P Carmichael, Jaewook Shin, John W Vaughan, Prafulla K Chandra, John B Holcomb, Anthony J Atala

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular and molecular regulation of fibrotic postoperative abdominal adhesions.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Collagen in Fibrotic Diseases.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. A Developmental Roadmap Toward Abdominal Adhesions Prevention Technologies.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. HerbalFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel P CarmichaelDivision of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: scarmich@wakehealth.edu.
Jaewook ShinDepartment of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
John W VaughanWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Prafulla K ChandraWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
John B HolcombDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
Anthony J AtalaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Forest Institute · USBrown University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001421 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, DAVID P · 2015 to 2023
$5.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, abdominal adhesions constitute a significant burden of morbidity and mortality. They represent the commonest complication of abdominal operations with a lifelong risk of multiple pathologies, including adhesive small bowel obstruction, female infertility, and chronic pain. Adhesions represent a problem of the entire abdomen, forming at the time of injury and progressing through multiple complex pathways. Clinically available preventative strategies are limited to barrier technologies. Significant knowledge gaps persist in the characterization and mitigation of the involved molecular pathways underlying adhesion formation. Thus, the objectives of this scoping review are to describe the known molecular pathophysiology implicated in abdominal adhesion formation and summarize novel preclinical regenerative medicine preventative strategies for potential future clinical investigation.

methodsA literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews. Included peer-reviewed publications were published within the last 5 y and contained in vivo preclinical experimental studies of postoperative adhesions with the assessment of underlying mechanisms of adhesion formation and successful therapy for adhesion prevention. Studies not involving regenerative medicine strategies were excluded. Data were qualitatively synthesized.

resultsA total of 1762 articles were identified. Of these, 1001 records were excluded by the described screening criteria. Sixty-eight full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, and 11 studies were included for review.

conclusionsNovel and reliable preventative strategies are urgently needed. Recent experimental data propose novel regenerative medicine targets for adhesion prevention.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionRegenerative MedicineAbdomenFemaleHumansIntestine, SmallPostoperative ComplicationsTissue AdhesionsAbdominal adhesionsBowel obstructionFibrosisRegenerative medicineSmall moleculesStem cells

Identifiers

PMID35306261
PMCPMC9038705
OpenAlexW4220843599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.