Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306155›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2022

Residual ctDNA after treatment predicts early relapse in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

D Gale, K Heider, A Ruiz-Valdepenas, S Hackinger, M Perry, G Marsico, V Rundell, J Wulff, G Sharma, H Knock and 12 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 211 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
30.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05641870 unknown statusnot on this map

Molecular Profiling and Dynamic Changes of Circulating Tumor DNA in Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorParc de Salut MarRan2021 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsLung Cancer, Stage III Lung Cancer, Unresectable Lung CarcinomaArmsSample collection, Characterization of the tumoral tissue genomic alterations, Chemoradiation treatment regimen and maintenance (if amenable), Genomic and methylation analysis in liquid biopsy
NCT07057102 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Applications of Multiple Omics Sequencing Technologies in Predicting the Efficacy and Monitoring the Recurrence of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Non-Interventional Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of postoperative circulating tumor DNA for recurrence-free survival in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Circulating tumour cells in patients with lung cancer universally indicate poor prognosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  15. A Real-World Assessment of Stage I Lung Cancer Through Electronic Nose Technology.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Towards liquid biopsy-based analysis of antitumour immunity.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

D GaleCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
K HeiderCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
A Ruiz-ValdepenasCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
S HackingerInivata Ltd, The Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Babraham, Cambridge, UK.
M PerryInivata Ltd, The Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Babraham, Cambridge, UK.
G MarsicoInivata Ltd, The Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Babraham, Cambridge, UK.
V RundellCambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge, UK.
J WulffCambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge, UK.
G SharmaInivata Ltd, The Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Babraham, Cambridge, UK.
H KnockCambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge, UK.
J CastedoCancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
W CooperCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
H ZhaoCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
C G SmithCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK.
S GargCancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Clifford Allbutt Building, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
S AnandCancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Clifford Allbutt Building, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
K HowarthInivata Ltd, The Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Babraham, Cambridge, UK.
D GilliganRoyal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
S V HardenAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
D M RasslCancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
R C RintoulCancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: rcr39@cam.ac.uk.
N RosenfeldCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK; Inivata Ltd, The Glenn Berge Building, Babraham Research Park, Babraham, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: nitzan.rosenfeld@cruk.cam.ac.uk.
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center · GBBabraham Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBPapworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11906Cancer Research UK 20240Cancer Research UK 27548Cancer Research UK 28292Cancer Research UK A20240Cancer Research UK C9545/A29580Cancer Research UK C9685/A25177Department of Health BRC-1215-20014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of residual disease in patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following treatment with curative intent holds promise to identify patients at risk of relapse. New methods can detect circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma to fractional concentrations as low as a few parts per million, and clinical evidence is required to inform their use. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed 363 serial plasma samples from 88 patients with early-stage NSCLC (48.9%/28.4%/22.7% at stage I/II/III), predominantly adenocarcinomas (62.5%), treated with curative intent by surgery (n = 61), surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy (n = 8), or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19). Tumour exome sequencing identified somatic mutations and plasma was analyzed using patient-specific RaDaR™ assays with up to 48 amplicons targeting tumour-specific variants unique to each patient.

resultsctDNA was detected before treatment in 24%, 77% and 87% of patients with stage I, II and III disease, respectively, and in 26% of all longitudinal samples. The median tumour fraction detected was 0.042%, with 63% of samples <0.1% and 36% of samples <0.01%. ctDNA detection had clinical specificity >98.5% and preceded clinical detection of recurrence of the primary tumour by a median of 212.5 days. ctDNA was detected after treatment in 18/28 (64.3%) of patients who had clinical recurrence of their primary tumour. Detection within the landmark timepoint 2 weeks to 4 months after treatment end occurred in 17% of patients, and was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR): 14.8, P <0.00001] and overall survival (HR: 5.48, P <0.0003). ctDNA was detected 1-3 days after surgery in 25% of patients yet was not associated with disease recurrence. Detection before treatment was associated with shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival (HR: 2.97 and 3.14, P values 0.01 and 0.003, respectively).

conclusionsctDNA detection after initial treatment of patients with early-stage NSCLC using sensitive patient-specific assays has potential to identify patients who may benefit from further therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNALung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcell-free DNA (cfDNA)circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)early detectionliquid biopsyminimal residual disease (MRD)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID35306155
PMCPMC9067454
OpenAlexW4221017231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.