Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306154›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2022

Genetic variation within the human papillomavirus type 16 genome is associated with oropharyngeal cancer prognosis.

K A Lang Kuhs, D L Faden, L Chen, D K Smith, M Pinheiro, C B Wood, S Davis, M Yeager, J F Boland, M Cullen and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Direct Comparison of Alternative Blood-Based Approaches for Early Detection and Diagnosis of HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

K A Lang KuhsDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Cancer, Nashville, USA. Electronic address: krystle.kuhs@uky.edu.
D L FadenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, USA.
L ChenDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine and Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
D K SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
M PinheiroDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA.
C B WoodDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
S DavisDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
M YeagerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, USA.
J F BolandDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, USA.
M CullenDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, USA.
M SteinbergDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, USA.
S BassDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, USA.
X WangDepartment of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
P LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
M MehradDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
T TuckerDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
J S LewisDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA; Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
R L FerrisUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
L MirabelloDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USLeidos (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Kentucky · USLeidos Biomedical Research Inc. (United States)Markey Cancer Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
MICRORNA BIOMARKERS FOR OROPHARYNGEAL CANCERR01DE026471 · NIDCR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAOWEI · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
Developing an oral health screening tool for an integrated model of care to reduce treatment-related oral morbidity in head and neck cancer survivorK23DE028010 · NIDCR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, DEREK KYLE · 2019 to 2023
$632k
Human Papillomavirus-Specific Biomarkers for the Prediction of Oropharyngeal Cancer RecurrenceK07CA218247 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KUHS, KRYSTLE A. · 2018 to 2021
$594k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCI NIH HHS K07 CA218247NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NIDCR NIH HHS K23 DE028010NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA significant barrier to adoption of de-escalated treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) is that few predictors of poor prognosis exist. We conducted the first large whole-genome sequencing (WGS) study to characterize the genetic variation of the HPV type 16 (HPV16) genome and to evaluate its association with HPV-OPC patient survival. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 460 OPC tumor specimens from two large United States medical centers (1980-2017) underwent HPV16 whole-genome sequencing. Site-specific variable positions [single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] across the HPV16 genome were identified. Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival by HPV16 SNPs. Harrell C-index and time-dependent positive predictive value (PPV) curves and areas under the PPV curves were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of HPV16 SNPs for overall survival.

resultsA total of 384 OPC tumor specimens (83.48%) passed quality control filters with sufficient depth and coverage of HPV16 genome sequencing to be analyzed. Some 284 HPV16 SNPs with a minor allele frequency ≥1% were identified. Eight HPV16 SNPs were significantly associated with worse survival after false discovery rate correction (individual prevalence: 1.0%-5.5%; combined prevalence: 15.10%); E1 gene position 1053 [HR for overall survival (HR

conclusionsHPV16 genetic variation is associated with HPV-OPC prognosis and can improve prognostic accuracy.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsGenetic VariationHuman papillomavirus 16HumansPapillomaviridaePrognosisHPV16HPV16 sublineagesHPV16 variantsOPCoropharyngeal cancerviral genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35306154
PMCPMC9350957
OpenAlexW4221011015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.