Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35306023›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Sticking around: Cell adhesion patterning for energy minimization and substrate mechanosensing.

Josephine Solowiej-Wedderburn, Carina M Dunlop

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josephine Solowiej-WedderburnDepartment of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Carina M DunlopDepartment of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK; Centre for Mathematical and Computational Biology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. Electronic address: c.dunlop@surrey.ac.uk.
University of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue stiffness (Young's modulus) is a key control parameter in cell behavior and bioengineered gels where defined mechanical properties have become an essential part of the toolkit for interrogating mechanotransduction. Here, we show using a mechanical cell model that the effective substrate stiffness experienced by a cell depends, not just on the engineered mechanical properties of the substrate but critically also on the particular arrangement of adhesions between cell and substrate. In particular, we find that cells with different adhesion patterns can experience two different gel stiffnesses as equivalent and will generate the same mean cell deformations. In considering small patches of adhesion, which mimic focal adhesion complexes, we show how the experimentally observed focal adhesion growth and elongation on stiff substrates can be explained by energy considerations. Relatedly, energy arguments also provide a reason why nascent adhesions do not establish into focal adhesions on soft substrates, as has been commonly observed. Fewer and larger adhesions are predicted to be preferred over more and smaller, an effect enhanced by random spot placing with the simulations predicting qualitatively realistic cell shapes in this case.

Indexed as

Focal AdhesionsMechanotransduction, CellularCell AdhesionCell ShapeElastic Modulus

Identifiers

PMID35306023
PMCPMC9117892
OpenAlexW4221000110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.