Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305857›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022

Evaluation of an anthropomorphic ion chamber and 3D gel dosimetry head phantom at a 0.35 T MR-linac using separate 1.5 T MR-scanners for gel readout.

Lukas Nierer, Florian Kamp, Michael Reiner, Stefanie Corradini, Moritz Rabe, Olaf Dietrich, Katia Parodi, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advancements in Tissue-Equivalent Gel Dosimeters.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. HyperArcGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas NiererDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: lukas.nierer@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Florian KampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Michael ReinerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Moritz RabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Olaf DietrichDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Katia ParodiDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christopher KurzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Guillaume LandryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo date, no universally accepted technique for the evaluation of the overall dosimetric performance of hybrid integrated magnetic resonance imaging (MR) - linear accelerators (linacs) is available. We report on the suitability and reliability of a novel phantom with modular inserts for combined polymer gel (PG) and ionisation chamber (IC) measurements at a 0.35 T MR-linac.

methodsThree 3D-printed, modular head phantoms, based on real patient anatomy, were used for repeated (2 times) PG irradiations of cranial treatment plans on a 0.35 T MR-linac. The PG readout was performed on two 1.5 T diagnostic MR-scanners to reduce scanning time. The PG dose volumes were normalised to the IC dose (normalised dose N1) and to the median planning target volume dose (normalised dose N2). Linearity of the PG dose response was validated and dose profiles, centres of mass (COM) of the 95% isodoses and dose volume histograms (DVH) were compared between planned and measured dose distributions and a 3D gamma analysis was performed.

resultsDose linearity of the PG was good (R

conclusionThe new modular phantom was found practical for use at a 0.35 T MR-linac. In contrast to the high dose region, larger mean deviations were found in the mid dose range. The PG measurements showed high reproducibility. The MR-linac performed well in a non-adaptive setting in terms of spatial and dosimetric accuracy.

Indexed as

Particle AcceleratorsRadiometryHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingPolymersRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsPolymersDosimetric accuracyMR-guided radiotherapyMultimodality phantomPolymer gel dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID35305857
PMCPMC9948847
OpenAlexW4221050876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.