ArticleBMC genomics2022
Complete chloroplast genome sequences of three aroideae species (Araceae): lights into selective pressure, marker development and phylogenetic relationships.
Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybridization footprint and the mechanism of leaf color differences inHorticulture research · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genome characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of Ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich).Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome of a Vietnam Endemic Aroid,Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Typhonium flagelliforme, an anti-cancer medicinal plant: genome structure, comparative and phylogenetic relationship analysis within Araceae.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Assembly and sequence analysis of the chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Comparative complete chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Advancing ornamental plant breeding through genomic technologies: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Codon usage patterns and genomic variation analysis of chloroplast genomes provides new insights into the evolution of Aroideae.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of complete chloroplast genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Plastome characterization and its phylogenetic implications on Lithocarpus (Fagaceae).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) in China and implications for phylogenetic relationships and adaptive evolution.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Chloroplast genome of four Amorphophallus species: genomic features,comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships among Amorphophallus species.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Comparative Chloroplast Genome Study ofGenes · 2024Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics, phylogenetic relationships and molecular markers development of Aglaonema commutatum and seven green cultivars of Aglaonema.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phylogenetic relationships, selective pressure and molecular markers development of six species in subfamily Polygonoideae based on complete chloroplast genomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The complete Chloroplast genome of Stachys geobombycis and comparative analysis with related Stachys species.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Thirteen complete chloroplast genomes of the costaceae family: insights into genome structure, selective pressure and phylogenetic relationships.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- The complete plastome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Kazakhstan tulips: comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes of four local and endangered species of the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColocasia gigantea, Caladium bicolor and Xanthosoma sagittifolium are three worldwide famous ornamental and/or vegetable plants in the Araceae family, these species in the subfamily Aroideae are phylogenetically perplexing due to shared interspecific morphological traits and variation.
resultThis study, for the first time ever, assembled and analyzed complete chloroplast genomes of C. gigantea, C. bicolor and X. sagittifolium with genome sizes of 165,906 bp, 153,149 bp and 165,169 bp in length, respectively. The genomes were composed of conserved quadripartite circular structures with a total of 131 annotated genes, including 8 rRNA, 37 tRNA and 86 protein-coding genes. A comparison within Aroideae showed seven protein-coding genes (accD, ndhF, ndhK, rbcL, rpoC1, rpoC2 and matK) linked to environmental adaptation. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed a close relationship of C. gigantea with C. esculenta and S. colocasiifolia, and the C. bicolor with X. sagittifolium. Furthermore, three DNA barcodes (atpH-atpI + psaC-ndhE, atpH-atpI + trnS-trnG, atpH-atpI + psaC-ndhE + trnS-trnG) harbored highly variable regions to distinguish species in Aroideae subfamily.
conclusionThese results would be beneficial for species identification, phylogenetic relationship, genetic diversity, and potential of germplasm resources in Aroideae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.