Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305401›Full record

ArticleESMO open2022

Characterizing kinase intergenic-breakpoint rearrangements in a large-scale lung cancer population and real-world clinical outcomes.

Y Yao, Z Yu, Y Ma, Q Ou, X Wu, D Lu, X Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Y YaoInternal Medicine-Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Z YuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Y MaGeneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Q OuGeneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
X WuGeneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
D LuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Institute of Respiratory Disease, Jinan, Shandong, China. Electronic address: deganlu@126.com.
X LiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. Electronic address: fcclixy1@zzu.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNShandong First Medical University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKinase gene fusions are strong driver mutations in neoplasia; however, kinase intergenic-breakpoint rearrangements (IGRs) confound the detection of such fusions and of targeted treatments. We aim to provide an overview of kinase IGRs in a large lung cancer cohort and examine real-world survival outcomes of patients with such fusions.

methodsMutational profiles analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing of 425 cancer-related genes between June 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data, clinical characteristics, and survivals were analyzed. RNA sequencing or immunohistochemical assays were carried out to verify chimeric fusion products.

resultsWe identified 3411 patients with kinase fusions from a cohort of 30 450 patients with lung cancer, and 624 kinase IGR events were identified in 538 of the 3411 patients. The most frequently identified kinase genes included anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), RET proto-oncogene (RET), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2/3 (ERBB2/3), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Our data showed that most (67%) kinase IGRs occurred on the same chromosome and kinase domains remained intact at the 3'-end. Approximately 3% (19/624) of the kinase IGRs had one genomic breakpoint located in gene promoter regions, including nine fusion events involving ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, ERBB2, or fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Among the 538 patients with kinase IGRs, 167 (31%) lacked oncogenic driver mutations, among which 28 received targeted therapies in real-world practice. Notably, three ALK IGR patients who harbored no canonical oncogenic aberrations were confirmed with an EML4-ALK chimeric fusion product by RNA sequencing and/or ALK immunohistochemical assays. One patient demonstrated a favorable clinical outcome after 14 months on crizotinib. An additional two patients who had ROS1 IGRs demonstrated a clinical benefit after 13 and 19 months on crizotinib, respectively.

conclusionA large real-world lung cancer cohort with kinase IGRs was comprehensively analyzed for their molecular characteristics. The data indicated the potential oncogenic function of kinase IGRs and their outcomes following the administration of targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene ProteinsCrizotinibGene RearrangementHumansRetrospective StudiesCrizotinibProto-Oncogene Proteinsintergenic breakpointskinase fusionlung cancerreal-world survivaltargeted next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35305401
PMCPMC9058911
OpenAlexW4220968760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.