Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305154›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2022

Comparison of three obturator nerve block techniques for injectate spread into the obturator canal: a randomized controlled trial.

Tetsuya Uchino, Masahiro Miura, Shigekiyo Matsumoto, Chihiro Shingu, Toshitaka Shin, Kenichiro Tomonari, Takaaki Kitano

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuya UchinoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1, Idaigaoka, Hazamacho, Yufushi, Oita, 879-5503, Japan. utetsuya@oita-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4223-3182
Masahiro MiuraDepartment of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Shigekiyo MatsumotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1, Idaigaoka, Hazamacho, Yufushi, Oita, 879-5503, Japan.
Chihiro ShinguDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1, Idaigaoka, Hazamacho, Yufushi, Oita, 879-5503, Japan.
Toshitaka ShinDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Kenichiro TomonariOita Diagnostic Imaging Center, Oita, Japan.
Takaaki KitanoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1, Idaigaoka, Hazamacho, Yufushi, Oita, 879-5503, Japan.
Oita University · JPOita Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe obturator nerve branches into the obturator canal; therefore, local anesthetic spread into the obturator canal predicts the success of the obturator nerve block (ONB). We compared three ONB techniques for the spread of local anesthetic mixed with contrast medium into the obturator canal.

methodsWe performed the ONB using the classical pubic approach (PA), inguinal approach (IA), or ultrasound-guided methodologic approach (UMA) in 143 patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors. The obturator nerve course and branching patterns of the UMA group were examined using ultrasound imaging. After injecting a local anesthetic mixed with a contrast medium, we evaluated its spread into the obturator canal using fluoroscopic imaging. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

resultsSuccess rate of obturator canal enhancement was the greatest in the UMA group (84%; P < 0.001); the PA (42.6%; 20/47 patients) and IA (47.8%; 22/46 patients) groups did not differ significantly (P = 1.000). Both branches of the obturator nerve passed above the superior margin of the external obturator muscle (EOM), and the obturator canal was enhanced in 13 of 50 (26%) patients in the UMA group. The posterior branch of the obturator nerve passed between the superior and main fasciculi of the EOM in 37 of 50 patients (74%) in the UMA group; the obturator canal was enhanced in 29 of these 37 patients (78%).

conclusionLocal anesthetic spread into the obturator canal using the UMA was superior to that using the PA and IA. Both branches of the obturator nerve could be blocked using the UMA.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionNerve BlockAnesthetics, LocalHumansInjectionsObturator NerveAnesthetics, LocalExternal obturator muscleObturator canalObturator nerveObturator nerve blockUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35305154
PMCPMC9156460
OpenAlexW4221055518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.