Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305140›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Nifedipine or amlodipine? The choice for hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jinjin Yin, Zhengrong Mei, Shengying Shi, Peili Du, Shumin Qin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinjin YinDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, People's Republic of China.
Zhengrong MeiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, People's Republic of China.
Shengying ShiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, People's Republic of China.
Peili DuDepartment of Obstetrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, People's Republic of China.
Shumin QinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510006, People's Republic of China. qhlio2011@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2507-6274
Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of sufficient evidence regarding efficacy and safety of amlodipine on treating hypertension during pregnancy.

objectiveTo compare antihypertensive efficacy, pregnancy outcome and safety of amlodipine with nifedipine on hypertension during pregnancy.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and China Biology Medicine disc of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to April l5, 2021 was conducted on RCTs comparing amlodipine to nifedipine for the treatment of hypertension during pregnancy. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were done by two independent reviewers. To estimate relative effects from all available evidence, a meta-analysis was conducted.

resultsSeventeen RCTs were included. Amlodipine was found the efficacy is slightly superior to nifedipine on treating hypertension during pregnancy (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10) with a decreased risk for maternal side effects (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.61). Subgroup analysis found amlodipine can get a better control on SBP (RR - 11.68, 95% CI - 17.98 to - 5.37) and DBP (RR - 7.44, 95% CI - 13.81 to - 1.06) compared with intermediate-/long-acting nifedipine. In addition, there was no difference between amlodipine and nifedipine on pregnancy outcomes including caesarean section, premature labour, placental abruption, FGR, fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia.

conclusionsGiven the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, amlodipine can be effectively and safely used for hypertension during pregnancy.

Indexed as

HypertensionObstetric Labor, PrematureAmlodipineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNifedipinePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeAmlodipineNifedipineAmlodipineHypertension during pregnancyMeta-analysisNifedipine

Identifiers

PMID35305140
OpenAlexW4220710020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.