Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305126›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2022

Sudden cardiac death while waiting: do we need the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator?

Carsten Israel, Ingo Staudacher, Christophe Leclercq, Giovanni Luca Botto, Daniel Scherr, Andreas Fach, Firat Duru, Maura M Zylla, Hugo A Katus, Dierk Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review on wearable cardioverter-defibrillators in clinical practice for sudden cardiac death prevention and heart failure management.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Carsten IsraelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ingo StaudacherDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christophe LeclercqUniversity of Rennes, CHU Rennes, LTSI-UMR1099, Rennes, France.
Giovanni Luca BottoOspedale di Circolo Rho, ASST Rhodense, Milan, Italy.
Daniel ScherrDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas FachKlinikum Links der Weser, Department of Cardiology, Bremen, Germany.
Firat DuruDivision of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maura M ZyllaDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hugo A KatusDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dierk ThomasDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. dierk.thomas@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5687-7843
Heidelberg University · DEAziende Socio Sanitaria Territoriale RhodenseEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEKlinikum Links der Weser · DELaboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image · FRMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most frequent cause of cardiovascular death in industrialized nations. Patients with cardiomyopathy are at increased risk for SCD and may benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The risk of SCD is highest in the first months after myocardial infarction or first diagnosis of severe non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. On the other hand, left ventricular function may improve in a subset of patients to such an extent that an ICD might no longer be needed. To offer protection from a transient risk of SCD, the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is available. Results of the first randomized clinical trial investigating the role of the WCD after myocardial infarction were recently published. This review is intended to provide insight into data from the VEST trial, and to put these into perspective with studies and clinical experience. As a non-invasive, temporary therapy, the WCD may offer advantages over early ICD implantation. However, recent data demonstrate that patient compliance and education play a crucial role in this new concept of preventing SCD.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesDefibrillators, ImplantableMyocardial InfarctionWearable Electronic DevicesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillatorsElectric CountershockHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorMyocardial infarctionSudden cardiac deathVentricular tachycardiaWearable cardioverter-defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID35305126
PMCPMC9622539
OpenAlexW4220692109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.