Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305113›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Time to focus on ACL revision: ESSKA 2022 consensus.

Thomas Tischer, Vincenzo Condello, Jacques Menetrey, David Dejour, Philippe Beaufils, Roland Becker

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Interpretation of the consensus by the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: part II-surgical strategy.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas TischerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Klinik Für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Rathsberger Straße 57, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. thomas.tischer@waldkrankenhaus.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3942-0235
Vincenzo CondelloJoint Preservation and Reconstructive Surgery and Sports Medicine Unit, Humanitas Castelli Clinic, Bergamo, Italy.
Jacques MenetreyCenter of Sports Medicine and Exercise, Hirslanden Clinique La Colline, Geneva, Switzerland.
David DejourUnité de Chirurgie du Genou, sportive et dégénératif, 29, avenue des Sources, Lyon, France.
Philippe BeaufilsESSKA Consensus Project Advisor, Versailles, France.
Roland BeckerCentre of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, University of Brandenburg an der Havel, Versailles, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.