Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305095›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging for Selected and Nonselected Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Pooja Vijayvargiya, Sumita Trivedi, Manali Rupji, Haocan Song, Yuan Liu, Renjian Jiang, Azeem S Kaka, Georgia Z Chen, William Stokes, Conor Steuer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Oncologic Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery in HPV-Associated OPSCC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Relevance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact ofBiomolecules & biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pooja VijayvargiyaDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-8494
Sumita TrivediDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Manali RupjiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Haocan SongDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Renjian JiangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Azeem S KakaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia Z ChenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William StokesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Conor SteuerDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dong M ShinDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jonathan J BeitlerDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mihir R PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ashley AikenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nabil F SabaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS P30CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging incorporates significant changes to the seventh edition in the staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC). An important change was the inclusion of OPSCC associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV). Our goal is to compare the performance of both staging systems for patients with HPV-selected and unselected clinical characteristics for OPSCC.

methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2004-2016, we identified patients with likely HPV-associated OPSCC based on surrogate markers (white males aged <65 years old with squamous cell carcinomas of the tonsil and base of tongue), excluding those who underwent surgery. We re-classified these patients using seventh and eighth edition staging for HPV-selected OPSCC and compared the prediction performance of both staging editions for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). We performed the same analysis for clinically unselected patients with OPSCC.

resultsOur analysis included 9554 patients with a median follow-up of 67 months. Comparing the eighth versus seventh edition for our HPV-selected cohort, clinical staging changed for 92.3% of patients and 10-year OS was 62.2%, 61.2%, 35.3%, and 15.5% for Stage I, II, III, and IV, versus 52.9%, 59.2%, 61.6%, 55.1%, 38.3%, and 15.5% for stage I, II, III, IVA, IVB, and IVC, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for 10-year DSS. The concordance statistics for our HPV-selected cohort were improved for both AJCC 7 (0.6260) and AJCC 8 (0.6846) compared with the unselected cohort, 0.5860 and 0.6457 for AJCC 7 and 8, respectively.

conclusionThe overall performance of discrimination improved from AJCC 7 to AJCC 8 for both clinically selected and unselected patients, but more notably for our HPV-selected cohort. Despite the lack of statistically significant differentiation between Stages I and II in AJCC 8 in either groups, markedly improved discrimination was observed between Stages I/II, III, and IV in the HPV-selected cohort.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsAgedHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPapillomaviridaePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAJCCdisease-specific survivalhuman papilloma virusoropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomaoverall survivalSEERstagingTNM

Identifiers

PMID35305095
PMCPMC8842371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.