Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304899›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2022

Safety and oncological outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kang Wang, Wenya Li, Ningquan Liu, Jianchun Cai, Yiyao Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kang WangDepartments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Wenya LiDepartments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Ningquan LiuDepartments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Jianchun CaiDepartments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China. jianchunfh2@sina.com.
Yiyao ZhangDepartments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China. doctorzhyy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-8450
Xiamen University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502039Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2016J01616Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2020J011214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is a new technique and uses natural orifice as the delivery route for specimen extraction to avoid supererogatory incision, and the safety and oncological outcomes of NOSES for right hemicolectomy are still inconclusive, so a meta-analysis was performed to compare these to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Related literature comparing NOSES with CLS for right hemicolectomy, whether randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective studies, were systematically searched. A random-effect model or fixed-effect model was used based on the I

Indexed as

ColectomyLaparoscopyHumansLength of StayOperative TimePainTreatment OutcomeConventional laparoscopy surgeryMeta-analysisNatural orifice specimen extraction surgeryRight hemicolectomy

Identifiers

PMID35304899
OpenAlexW4220971204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.