Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304877›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Motivational signals disrupt metacognitive signals in the human ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Monja Hoven, Gina Brunner, Nina S de Boer, Anna E Goudriaan, Damiaan Denys, Ruth J van Holst, Judy Luigjes, Maël Lebreton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Rewards bias self-evaluations of ability.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Correlates of Metacognition Impairment in Opioid Addiction.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Monja HovenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.hoven@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0900-8565
Gina BrunnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nina S de BoerDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna E GoudriaanDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Damiaan DenysDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruth J van Holst *Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judy Luigjes *Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maël Lebreton *Swiss Center for Affective Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLJellinek · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

EPA EP-D-15-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that, during decision-making, BOLD signal in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) correlates both with motivational variables - such as incentives and expected values - and metacognitive variables - such as confidence judgments - which reflect the subjective probability of being correct. At the behavioral level, we recently demonstrated that the value of monetary stakes bias confidence judgments, with gain (respectively loss) prospects increasing (respectively decreasing) confidence judgments, even for similar levels of difficulty and performance. If and how this value-confidence interaction is reflected in the VMPFC remains unknown. Here, we used an incentivized perceptual decision-making fMRI task that dissociates key decision-making variables, thereby allowing to test several hypotheses about the role of the VMPFC in the value-confidence interaction. While our initial analyses seemingly indicate that the VMPFC combines incentives and confidence to form an expected value signal, we falsified this conclusion with a meticulous dissection of qualitative activation patterns. Rather, our results show that strong VMPFC confidence signals observed in trials with gain prospects are disrupted in trials with no - or negative (loss) - monetary prospects. Deciphering how decision variables are represented and interact at finer scales seems necessary to better understand biased (meta)cognition.

Indexed as

MetacognitionMotivationHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID35304877
PMCPMC8933484
OpenAlexW4221007117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.