Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304827›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2022

Observations on the distribution and control of Salmonella in commercial broiler hatcheries in Great Britain.

Claire E Oastler, Christopher Nichols, Kate Newton, Shaun Cawthraw, Rebecca J Gosling, Francesca Martelli, Andrew D Wales, Robert H Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence and Characteristics ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Biofilm-forming capability ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Guess Who's Back: Persistence and Circulation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The probioticInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire E OastlerDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9799-4085
Christopher NicholsDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.
Kate NewtonDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.
Shaun CawthrawDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.
Rebecca J GoslingDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.
Francesca MartelliDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.
Andrew D WalesDepartment of Pathology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-3007
Robert H DaviesDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella can enter hatcheries via contaminated eggs and other breaches of biosecurity. The study examined the prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in commercial hatcheries and assessed the effects of providing advice on Salmonella control. Intensive swab sampling was performed throughout 23 broiler hatcheries in Great Britain (GB). Swabs were cultured using a modified ISO6579:2017 method. After each visit, tailored advice on biosecurity and cleaning and disinfection procedures was provided to the hatchery managers. Repeat sampling was carried out in 10 of the 23 hatcheries. Salmonella prevalence ranged between 0% and 33.5%, with the chick handling areas, hatcher areas, macerator area, tray wash/storage areas, external areas and other waste handling areas being more contaminated than the setter areas. Salmonella Senftenberg and Salmonella 13,23:i:- were the most commonly isolated serovars. There was a reduction in Salmonella prevalence at the second visit in eight out of 10 premises, but prevalence values had increased again in all of the improved hatcheries that were visited a third time. One hatchery harboured a difficult-to-control resident Salmonella 13,23:i:- strain and was visited six times; by the final visit, Salmonella prevalence was 2.3%, reduced from a high of 23.1%. In conclusion, the study found low-level Salmonella contamination in some GB broiler hatcheries, with certain hatcheries being more severely affected. Furthermore, it was shown that Salmonella typically is difficult to eradicate from contaminated hatcheries, but substantial reductions in prevalence are possible with improvements to biosecurity, cleaning and disinfection.

Indexed as

Poultry DiseasesSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsChickensOvumSalmonellaUnited KingdombroilereggshatcherypoultrySalmonella

Identifiers

PMID35304827
PMCPMC9543921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.