Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304757›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontal research2022

Ability of matrix metalloproteinase-8 biosensor, IFMA, and ELISA immunoassays to differentiate between periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis.

Kehinde Adesola Umeizudike, Hanna Lähteenmäki, Ismo T Räisänen, John J Taylor, Philip M Preshaw, Susan M Bissett, Taina Tervahartiala, Solomon O Nwhator, Pirjo Pärnänen, Timo Sorsa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontal research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kehinde Adesola UmeizudikeDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-872X
Hanna LähteenmäkiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ismo T RäisänenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5821-5299
John J TaylorSchool of Dental Sciences and Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Philip M PreshawSchool of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Susan M BissettSchool of Dental Sciences and Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Taina TervahartialaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Solomon O NwhatorDepartment of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Pirjo PärnänenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-8690
Timo SorsaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FINewcastle Dental Hospital · GBObafemi Awolowo University · NGUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Finnish Dental Association Apollonia, FinlandHelsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) TYH2016251Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) TYH2017251Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) TYH2018229Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) TYH2019319Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) Y1014SL017Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) Y1014SL018Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) Y1014SULE1Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of an MMP-8 biosensor assay in differentiating periodontal health from gingivitis and periodontitis and compare it with an established time-resolved immunofluorescence assay (IFMA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

backgroundCurrently available antibody-based assays display a wide variability in their ability to accurately measure matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) levels in saliva.

methodsSalivary MMP-8 levels were analyzed in 189 systemically healthy participants using an antibody-based biosensor prototype that operates using a surface acoustic wave technology and compared with IFMA and ELISA antibody assays. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: periodontal health (59), gingivitis (63), and periodontitis (67). A sub-population of participants (n = 20) with periodontitis received periodontal treatment and were monitored for 6 months.

resultsAll the assays demonstrated significantly higher salivary MMP-8 concentrations in participants with periodontitis versus gingivitis, periodontitis versus health, and gingivitis versus health (all p < .05). The biosensor data demonstrated significant correlations with IFMA (r = .354, p < .001) and ELISA (r = .681, p < .001). Significant reductions in salivary MMP-8 concentrations were detected by the biosensor (p = .030) and IFMA (p = .002) in participants with periodontitis 6 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment. IFMA had the best sensitivity (89.2%) for detecting periodontitis and gingivitis versus health and 96.6% for detecting periodontitis versus health and gingivitis. The biosensor had an AUC value of 0.81 and diagnostic accuracy of 74.2% for differentiating periodontitis and gingivitis from health; an AUC value of 0.86 and diagnostic accuracy of 82.8% for periodontitis versus health and gingivitis.

conclusionsThe biosensor, IFMA, and ELISA assays differentiated between periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis based on salivary MMP-8 levels. Only the biosensor and, particularly, IFMA identified an effect of periodontal treatment in the participants with periodontitis. Our findings support the potential utility of salivary oral fluid aMMP-8-based point-of-care technology in the future of periodontal diagnostics.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesGingivitisPeriodontitisAntibodiesBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoassayMatrix Metalloproteinase 8SalivaAntibodiesBiomarkersMatrix Metalloproteinase 8active/total matrix metalloproteinase-8; salivabiosensorperiodontal disease

Identifiers

PMID35304757
PMCPMC9311725
OpenAlexW4220924234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.