Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304700›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2022

Whether attentional loads influence audiovisual integration depends on semantic associations.

Qingqing Li, Yiyang Yu, Yulong Liu, Zhihan Xu, Lu Fan, Satoshi Takahashi, Jiajia Yang, Yoshimichi Ejima, Qiong Wu, Jinglong Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qingqing LiCollege of Teacher Education, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Yiyang YuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan.
Yulong LiuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan.
Zhihan XuDepartment of Foreign Language, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, China.
Lu FanCollege of Teacher Education, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Satoshi TakahashiCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan.
Jiajia YangCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan.
Yoshimichi EjimaCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan.
Qiong WuDepartment of Psychology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China. wuqiong@usts.edu.cn.
Jinglong WuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan. jl.wu@siat.ac.cn.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 17K18855, 18H05009, 18K12149, and 18H01411the Social Science project of Suzhou University of science and Technolog 332012902, 341922905Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LQ22C090003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal studies have shown that selectively attending to a common object in one sensory modality results in facilitated processing of that object's representations in the ignored sensory modality. Thus, the audiovisual (AV) integration of common objects can be observed under modality-specific selective attention. However, little is known about whether this AV integration can also occur under increased attentional load conditions. Additionally, whether semantic associations between multisensory features of common objects modulate the influence of increased attentional loads on this cross-modal integration remains unknown. In the present study, participants completed an AV integration task (ignored auditory stimuli) under various attentional load conditions: no load, low load, and high load. The semantic associations between AV stimuli were composed of animal pictures presented concurrently with semantically congruent, semantically incongruent, or semantically unrelated auditory stimuli. Our results demonstrated that attentional loads did not disrupt the integration of semantically congruent AV stimuli but suppressed the potential alertness effects induced by incongruent or unrelated auditory stimuli under the condition of modality-specific selective attention. These findings highlight the critical role of semantic association between AV stimuli in modulating the effect of attentional loads on the AV integration of modality-specific selective attention.

Indexed as

SemanticsVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAttentionAuditory PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationAttentional loadAudiovisual integrationModality-specific selective attentionSemantic associations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.