ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
Utilizing Synthetic Nodules for Improving Nodule Detection in Chest Radiographs.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for chest radiography: an overview of techniques, challenges, and future directions.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Enhancing Radiographic Diagnosis: CycleGAN-Based Methods for Reducing Cast Shadow Artifacts in Wrist Radiographs.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Phenotype augmentation using generative AI for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation prediction in glioma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: novel cost function for effective network training with purely synthesized datasets.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Updated Primer on Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Medical Imaging for Medical Professionals.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Overcoming the Challenges in the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Comprehensive Review of Solutions Beyond Supervised Learning.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Review
- A systematic approach to deep learning-based nodule detection in chest radiographs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Algorithms that automatically identify nodular patterns in chest X-ray (CXR) images could benefit radiologists by reducing reading time and improving accuracy. A promising approach is to use deep learning, where a deep neural network (DNN) is trained to classify and localize nodular patterns (including mass) in CXR images. Such algorithms, however, require enough abnormal cases to learn representations of nodular patterns arising in practical clinical settings. Obtaining large amounts of high-quality data is impractical in medical imaging where (1) acquiring labeled images is extremely expensive, (2) annotations are subject to inaccuracies due to the inherent difficulty in interpreting images, and (3) normal cases occur far more frequently than abnormal cases. In this work, we devise a framework to generate realistic nodules and demonstrate how they can be used to train a DNN identify and localize nodular patterns in CXR images. While most previous research applying generative models to medical imaging are limited to generating visually plausible abnormalities and using these patterns for augmentation, we go a step further to show how the training algorithm can be adjusted accordingly to maximally benefit from synthetic abnormal patterns. A high-precision detection model was first developed and tested on internal and external datasets, and the proposed method was shown to enhance the model's recall while retaining the low level of false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.