ArticleScientific reports2022
Impact of signal strength on quantitative retinal and choriocapillaris flow measurement from optical coherence tomography angiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking choriocapillaris OCTA interpretation-The case of optics misleading biology.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Image Quality as an Important Confounder in Quantitative OCT Angiography: A Review with Quantitative Synthesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Hypertension on Macular Perfusion in Patients With Referable Diabetic Retinopathy: An OCTA Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Association of Genetic Risk for Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Morphological Features of the Retinal Microvascular Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Factors affecting optical coherence tomography angiography signal strength index in patients receiving intravitreal injection treatment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- The OSCAR-MP Consensus Criteria for Quality Assessment of Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2023Review
- The Impact of Cataracts on the Measurement of Macular Choriocapillaris Flow Deficits Using Swept-Source OCT Angiography.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the impact of signal strength (SS) on quantitative measurements from optical coherence tomography (OCTA). Twenty healthy-volunteers were included. A neutral density filter (NDF) was attached to spectral-domain OCTA (SD-OCTA) and swept-source OCTA (SS-OCTA). All subjects were imaged with both devices three times using three different conditions: no filter, NDF0.3, and NDF0.6. For SD-OCTA, SS decreased from 10.0 to 8.2 and 4.0 with the NDF0.3 and 0.6, respectively. The vessel density (VD) and vessel length density (VLD) of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) decreased when SS decreased from 10 to 8.2, but no further decrease when SS changed from 8.2 to 4.0. The flow metrics of the deep capillary plexus (DCP) did not change. For SS-OCTA, SS decreased from 10 to 9.5 and 7.2. The VD and VLD of the SCP and DCP decreased when SS decreased, except for the VD of the DCP when SS changed from 10 to 9.5. The choriocapillaris flow deficits significantly increased along with the decrease in SS. Quantitative flow parameters were significantly affected by a small change in SS and were most conspicuous in the SCP and choriocapillaris. These finding highlight the importance of high and consistent SS in quantitative OCTA studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.