Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304556›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Synthetic exposure with a CMOS camera for multiple exposure speckle imaging of blood flow.

M Chammas, F Pain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wide-field intensity fluctuation imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  4. Wide dynamic range measurement of blood flowJournal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M ChammasLaboratoire Charles Fabry, Institut d'Optique Graduate School, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91127, Palaiseau, France.
F PainLaboratoire Charles Fabry, Institut d'Optique Graduate School, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91127, Palaiseau, France. frederic.pain@universite-paris-saclay.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speckle contrast imaging is an established technique to obtain relative blood flow maps over wide fields of view. A major improvement of the method relies on the acquisition of raw speckle images at different exposure times but requires simultaneous modulation of a laser pulse in duration and intensity and precise synchronization with a camera. This complex instrumentation has limited the use of multiple exposure speckle imaging. We evaluate here the use of a CMOS camera for a simplified approach based on synthetic exposure images created from the sum of successive frames acquired at a 1 ms exposure time. Both methods have been applied to evaluate controlled flows in micro-channels. The contribution of noises to the speckle contrast have been quantified and compared. Dark, readout and shot noise contributions to the total contrast remain constant for modulated exposure, while all these contributions decrease with increasing exposure time for synthetic exposure. The relative contribution of noises to speckle contrast depends on the level of illumination and the exposure time. Guidelines for flow measurements and limitations of the use of a CMOS camera with a limited frame rate for synthetic exposure acquisition scheme are discussed. The synthetic exposure method is simple to implement and should facilitate the translation of multiple exposure speckle imaging to clinical set-ups.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsLasersDiagnostic Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35304556
PMCPMC8933569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.