ArticleScientific reports2022
Synthetic exposure with a CMOS camera for multiple exposure speckle imaging of blood flow.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed neural network for mapping vascular and tissue dynamics using laser speckle contrast imaging.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Affordable miniaturized speckle contrast diffuse correlation tomography device for depth-sensitive mapping of cerebral blood flow in rodents.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Wide-field intensity fluctuation imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Wide dynamic range measurement of blood flowJournal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Design and validation of a convolutional neural network for fast, model-free blood flow imaging with multiple exposure speckle imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- A Wearable Fiber-Free Optical Sensor for Continuous Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow in Freely Behaving Mice.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- All fiber-based illumination system for multi-exposure speckle imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speckle contrast imaging is an established technique to obtain relative blood flow maps over wide fields of view. A major improvement of the method relies on the acquisition of raw speckle images at different exposure times but requires simultaneous modulation of a laser pulse in duration and intensity and precise synchronization with a camera. This complex instrumentation has limited the use of multiple exposure speckle imaging. We evaluate here the use of a CMOS camera for a simplified approach based on synthetic exposure images created from the sum of successive frames acquired at a 1 ms exposure time. Both methods have been applied to evaluate controlled flows in micro-channels. The contribution of noises to the speckle contrast have been quantified and compared. Dark, readout and shot noise contributions to the total contrast remain constant for modulated exposure, while all these contributions decrease with increasing exposure time for synthetic exposure. The relative contribution of noises to speckle contrast depends on the level of illumination and the exposure time. Guidelines for flow measurements and limitations of the use of a CMOS camera with a limited frame rate for synthetic exposure acquisition scheme are discussed. The synthetic exposure method is simple to implement and should facilitate the translation of multiple exposure speckle imaging to clinical set-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.