Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304466›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Parallel reduction in flowering time from de novo mutations enable evolutionary rescue in colonizing lineages.

Andrea Fulgione, Célia Neto, Ahmed F Elfarargi, Emmanuel Tergemina, Shifa Ansari, Mehmet Göktay, Herculano Dinis, Nina Döring, Pádraic J Flood, Sofia Rodriguez-Pacheco and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome-wide CG hypomethylation of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Genomic history and ecology of local adaptation in sky-islandbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Convergent evolution increases boron transport through SNPs and tandem duplications atProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andrea Fulgione *Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Célia Neto *Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3256-5228
Ahmed F ElfarargiMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-1848
Emmanuel TergeminaMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-7212
Shifa AnsariMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Mehmet GöktayMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Herculano DinisParque Natural do Fogo, Direção Nacional do Ambiente, Praia, Santiago, Cabo Verde.
Nina DöringMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Pádraic J FloodMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Sofia Rodriguez-PachecoMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Nora WaldenCentre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Biodiversity and Plant Systematics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-6791
Marcus A KochCentre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Biodiversity and Plant Systematics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-6829
Fabrice RouxLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Joachim HermissonMathematics and Bioscience, Department of Mathematics and Max F. Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Angela M HancockMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany. hancock@mpipz.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-3377

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how populations adapt to abrupt environmental change is necessary to predict responses to future challenges, but identifying specific adaptive variants, quantifying their responses to selection and reconstructing their detailed histories is challenging in natural populations. Here, we use Arabidopsis from the Cape Verde Islands as a model to investigate the mechanisms of adaptation after a sudden shift to a more arid climate. We find genome-wide evidence of adaptation after a multivariate change in selection pressures. In particular, time to flowering is reduced in parallel across islands, substantially increasing fitness. This change is mediated by convergent de novo loss of function of two core flowering time genes: FRI on one island and FLC on the other. Evolutionary reconstructions reveal a case where expansion of the new populations coincided with the emergence and proliferation of these variants, consistent with models of rapid adaptation and evolutionary rescue.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsFlowersMADS Domain ProteinsMutationArabidopsis ProteinsMADS Domain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35304466
PMCPMC8933414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.