Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304453›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Mechanism and biomass association of glucuronoyl esterase: an α/β hydrolase with potential in biomass conversion.

Zhiyou Zong, Scott Mazurkewich, Caroline S Pereira, Haohao Fu, Wensheng Cai, Xueguang Shao, Munir S Skaf, Johan Larsbrink, Leila Lo Leggio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular mechanism of LIP05 derived fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhiyou ZongDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-7331
Scott MazurkewichWallenberg Wood Science Center, Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-0615
Caroline S PereiraInstitute of Chemistry and Center for Computing in Engineering and Sciences, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, 13084-862, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-0883
Haohao FuCollege of Chemistry, Research Center for Analytical Sciences, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Wensheng CaiCollege of Chemistry, Research Center for Analytical Sciences, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6457-7058
Xueguang ShaoCollege of Chemistry, Research Center for Analytical Sciences, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Munir S SkafInstitute of Chemistry and Center for Computing in Engineering and Sciences, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, 13084-862, Brazil.
Johan LarsbrinkWallenberg Wood Science Center, Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-2914
Leila Lo LeggioDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. leila@chem.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-0882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucuronoyl esterases (GEs) are α/β serine hydrolases and a relatively new addition in the toolbox to reduce the recalcitrance of lignocellulose, the biggest obstacle in cost-effective utilization of this important renewable resource. While biochemical and structural characterization of GEs have progressed greatly recently, there have yet been no mechanistic studies shedding light onto the rate-limiting steps relevant for biomass conversion. The bacterial GE OtCE15A possesses a classical yet distinctive catalytic machinery, with easily identifiable catalytic Ser/His completed by two acidic residues (Glu and Asp) rather than one as in the classical triad, and an Arg side chain participating in the oxyanion hole. By QM/MM calculations, we identified deacylation as the decisive step in catalysis, and quantified the role of Asp, Glu and Arg, showing the latter to be particularly important. The results agree well with experimental and structural data. We further calculated the free-energy barrier of post-catalysis dissociation from a complex natural substrate, suggesting that in industrial settings non-catalytic processes may constitute the rate-limiting step, and pointing to future directions for enzyme engineering in biomass utilization.

Indexed as

EsterasesHydrolasesBiomassCatalysisEsterasesHydrolases

Identifiers

PMID35304453
PMCPMC8933493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.