Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304450›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

The interplay of additivity, dominance, and epistasis on fitness in a diploid yeast cross.

Takeshi Matsui, Martin N Mullis, Kevin R Roy, Joseph J Hale, Rachel Schell, Sasha F Levy, Ian M Ehrenreich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takeshi Matsui *Joint Initiative for Metrology in Biology, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Martin N Mullis *Molecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-7528
Kevin R RoyJoint Initiative for Metrology in Biology, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-6207
Joseph J HaleMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Rachel SchellMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Sasha F LevyJoint Initiative for Metrology in Biology, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. sflevy@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0923-1636
Ian M EhrenreichMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. ian.ehrenreich@usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-9063
University of Southern California · USSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · USStanford University · US

Funding

Characterizing the complex underpinnings of genetic background effectsR35GM130381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Ian Michael Ehrenreich · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
Multiplexed In Vivo DNA AssemblyR01HG011676 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, SASHA F · 2022 to 2024
$2.9M
Comparative Functional Genomics of YeastR01HG010378 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUNHAM, MAITREYA J, SHERLOCK, GAVIN J · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
PPiSeq: High-Throughput Protein-Protein Interaction SequencingR01AI164530 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHERLOCK, GAVIN J · 2021 to 2024
$1.7M
Comprehensive dissection of higher-order genetic interactionsR01GM110255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EHRENREICH, IAN MICHAEL · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
CBI: Chemistry Biology InterfaceT32GM118289 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FORSBURG, SUSAN L · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010378NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011676NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI164530NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110255NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130381NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM118289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In diploid species, genetic loci can show additive, dominance, and epistatic effects. To characterize the contributions of these different types of genetic effects to heritable traits, we use a double barcoding system to generate and phenotype a panel of ~200,000 diploid yeast strains that can be partitioned into hundreds of interrelated families. This experiment enables the detection of thousands of epistatic loci, many whose effects vary across families. Here, we show traits are largely specified by a small number of hub loci with major additive and dominance effects, and pervasive epistasis. Genetic background commonly influences both the additive and dominance effects of loci, with multiple modifiers typically involved. The most prominent dominance modifier in our data is the mating locus, which has no effect on its own. Our findings show that the interplay between additivity, dominance, and epistasis underlies a complex genotype-to-phenotype map in diploids.

Indexed as

DiploidySaccharomyces cerevisiaeEpistasis, GeneticExerciseHumansModels, GeneticPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID35304450
PMCPMC8933436
OpenAlexW4220930003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.