Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304420›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2022

NeoScore Integrates Characteristics of the Neoantigen:MHC Class I Interaction and Expression to Accurately Prioritize Immunogenic Neoantigens.

Elizabeth S Borden, Suhail Ghafoor, Kenneth H Buetow, Bonnie J LaFleur, Melissa A Wilson, K Taraszka Hastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth S BordenDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-2665-0218
Suhail GhafoorCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-9070-8920
Kenneth H BuetowCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.ORCID 0000-0003-4439-0939
Bonnie J LaFleurBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-9337
Melissa A WilsonCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-0285
K Taraszka HastingsDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; khasting@email.arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-8033

Funding

MHC Class II Antigen Presentation In Melanoma: Impact on Immune RecognitionI01BX005336 · VA · PHOENIX VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI KAREN TARASZKA HASTINGS · 2021 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX005336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prioritization of immunogenic neoantigens is key to developing personalized cancer vaccines and distinguishing those patients likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibition. However, there is no consensus regarding which characteristics best predict neoantigen immunogenicity, and no model to date has both high sensitivity and specificity and a significant association with survival in response to immunotherapy. We address these challenges in the prioritization of immunogenic neoantigens by (1) identifying which neoantigen characteristics best predict immunogenicity; (2) integrating these characteristics into an immunogenicity score, the NeoScore; and (3) demonstrating a significant association of the NeoScore with survival in response to immune checkpoint inhibition. One thousand random and evenly split combinations of immunogenic and nonimmunogenic neoantigens from a validated dataset were analyzed using a regularized regression model for characteristic selection. The selected characteristics, the dissociation constant and binding stability of the neoantigen:MHC class I complex and expression of the mutated gene in the tumor, were integrated into the NeoScore. A web application is provided for calculation of the NeoScore. The NeoScore results in improved, or equivalent, performance in four test datasets as measured by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve compared with previous models. Among cutaneous melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibition, a high maximum NeoScore was associated with improved survival. Overall, the NeoScore has the potential to improve neoantigen prioritization for the development of personalized vaccines and contribute to the determination of which patients are likely to respond to immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35304420
PMCPMC8983234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.