Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304396›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Non-operative management after chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation or sandwich (induction with bevacizumab and consolidation) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase II trial (NOMINATE trial).

Takashi Akiyoshi, Eiji Shinozaki, Senzo Taguchi, Akiko Chino, Makiko Hiratsuka, Tetsuro Tominaga, Takashi Nonaka, Shigeo Toda, Shuichiro Matoba, Shimpei Matsui and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Takashi AkiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan takashi.akiyoshi@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2321-1412
Eiji ShinozakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Senzo TaguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-8084
Akiko ChinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Makiko HiratsukaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuro TominagaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takashi NonakaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shigeo TodaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuichiro MatobaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shimpei MatsuiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji OkabayashiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiki MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiharu HiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-0985
Toshiya NagasakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi UenoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroya KuroyanagiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke FukunagaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki IshizukaDepartment of Clinical Trial Planning and Management, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi KonishiDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
for NOMINATE Collaborative Group
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPToranomon Hospital · JPKeio University · JPNagasaki University · JPThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTotal mesorectal excision (TME) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, neoadjuvant CRT has no recognised impact on reducing distant recurrence, and patients suffer from a long-lasting impairment in quality of life (QOL) associated with TME. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an alternative approach that could reduce distant metastases and increase the proportion of patients who could safely undergo non-operative management (NOM). This study is designed to compare two TNT regimens in the context of NOM for selecting a more optimal regimen for patients with LARC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: NOMINATE trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised phase II selection design study. Patients must have clinical stage II or III (T3-T4Nany) LARC with distal location (≤5 cm from the anal verge or for those who are candidates for abdominoperineal resection or intersphincteric resection). Patients will be randomised to either arm A consisting of CRT (50.4 Gy with capecitabine) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (six cycles of CapeOx), or arm B consisting of induction chemotherapy (three cycles of CapeOx plus bevacizumab) followed by CRT and consolidation chemotherapy (three cycles of CapeOx). In the case of clinical complete response (cCR) or near cCR, patients will progress to NOM. Response assessment involves a combination of digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving pathological CR or cCR≥2 years, defined as the absence of local regrowth within 2 years after the start of NOM among eligible patients. Secondary endpoints include the cCR rate, near cCR rate, rate of NOM, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, time to disease-related treatment failure, TME-free survival, permanent stoma-free survival, safety of the treatment, completion rate of the treatment and QOL. Allowing for a drop-out rate of 10%, 66 patients (33 per arm) from five institutions will be accrued. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by Wakayama Medical University Certified Review Board in December 2020. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and on the jRCT website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs051200121.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabChemoradiotherapyConsolidation ChemotherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBevacizumabchemotherapycolorectal surgeryradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35304396
PMCPMC8935173
OpenAlexW4220980348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.