Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304395›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Physiological-based cord clamping versus immediate cord clamping for infants born with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (PinC): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Emily J J Horn-Oudshoorn, Ronny Knol, Marijn J Vermeulen, Arjan B Te Pas, Stuart B Hooper, Suzan C M Cochius-den Otter, Rene M H Wijnen, Kelly J Crossley, Neysan Rafat, Thomas Schaible and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04373902 (Physiological-based Cord Clamping Versus Immediate Cord Clamping for Infants Born With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04373902 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Physiological-based Cord Clamping Versus Immediate Cord Clamping for Infants Born With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: a Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2020 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsHernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital, Hernia, Diaphragm Defect, Congenital, Pulmonary HypertensionArmsPhysiological-based cord clamping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Care of the Newborn and Cord During the Third Stage of Labour (Scientific Impact Paper No. 78).BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Review
  3. Predictors of challenging initial intubation and association with outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Maternal implications of placental transfusion.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Emily J J Horn-OudshoornDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0582-1129
Ronny KnolDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marijn J VermeulenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan B Te PasDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stuart B HooperThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Suzan C M Cochius-den OtterDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-285X
Rene M H WijnenDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kelly J CrossleyThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Neysan RafatDepartment of Neonatology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas SchaibleDepartment of Neonatology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Willem P de BoodeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Radboudumc University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne DebeerDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Berndt UrlesbergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Calum T RobertsThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Florian KipfmuellerDepartment of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bonn Children's Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Irwin K M ReissDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip L J DeKoninckThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia p.dekoninck@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DEKU Leuven · BELeiden University Medical Center · NLMedical University of Graz · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPulmonary hypertension is a major determinant of postnatal survival in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The current care during the perinatal stabilisation period in these infants might contribute to the development of pulmonary hypertension after birth-in particular umbilical cord clamping before lung aeration. An ovine model of diaphragmatic hernia demonstrated that cord clamping after lung aeration, called physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC), avoided the initial high pressures in the lung vasculature while maintaining adequate blood flow, thereby avoiding vascular remodelling and aggravation of pulmonary hypertension. We aim to investigate if the implementation of PBCC in the perinatal stabilisation period of infants born with a CDH could reduce the incidence of pulmonary hypertension in the first 24 hours after birth. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in infants with an isolated left-sided CDH, born at ≥35.0 weeks. Before birth, infants will be randomised to either PBCC or immediate cord clamping, stratified by treatment centre and severity of pulmonary hypoplasia on antenatal ultrasound. PBCC will be performed using a purpose-built resuscitation trolley. Cord clamping will be performed when the infant is considered respiratory stable, defined as a heart rate >100 bpm, preductal oxygen saturation >85%, while using a fraction of inspired oxygen of <0.5. The primary outcome is pulmonary hypertension diagnosed in the first 24 hours after birth, based on clinical and echocardiographic parameters. Secondary outcomes include neonatal as well as maternal outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Central ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (METC 2019-0414). Local ethical approval will be obtained by submitting the protocol to the regulatory bodies and local institutional review boards. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04373902.

Indexed as

Hernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalAnimalsConstrictionFemaleHumansInfantMulticenter Studies as TopicParturitionPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSheepUmbilical CordUmbilical Cord ClampingNEONATOLOGYOBSTETRICSPERINATOLOGYRespiratory physiology

Identifiers

PMID35304395
PMCPMC8935184
OpenAlexW4220782434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.