ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2022
Federated Learning for Multicenter Collaboration in Ophthalmology: Implications for Clinical Diagnosis and Disease Epidemiology.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of a Quantitative Vascular Severity Score in Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United States and India: New Insights Into Disease Epidemiology and Pathophysiology.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Automated Report Generation in Ophthalmology: Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Imaging, and Clinical Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Federated Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting Ocular Diseases in Medical Imaging: A Systematic Review.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Neonatal supraventricular tachycardia: current diagnostic approaches and emerging technologies.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Enhancing bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction in preterm infants using artificial intelligence and multimodal data integration.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- A review on federated learning in computational pathology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- FedEYE: A scalable and flexible end-to-end federated learning platform for ophthalmology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Toward fairness in artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: identification and mitigation of potential biases in the roadmap from data collection to model deployment.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Epidemiologic Evaluation of Retinopathy of Prematurity Severity in a Large Telemedicine Program in India Using Artificial Intelligence.Ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Federated learning for diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Federated Learning in Ocular Imaging: Current Progress and Future Direction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Effect of temperature on evaporation dynamics of sheep's blood droplets and topographic analysis of induced patterns.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Federated Learning for Multicenter Collaboration in Ophthalmology: Improving Classification Performance in Retinopathy of Prematurity.Ophthalmology. Retina · 2022Article
- Federated Learning in Glaucoma: A Comprehensive Review and Future Perspectives.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaReview
- Big data and electronic health records for glaucoma research.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo utilize a deep learning (DL) model trained via federated learning (FL), a method of collaborative training without sharing patient data, to delineate institutional differences in clinician diagnostic paradigms and disease epidemiology in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
designEvaluation of a diagnostic test or technology. SUBJECTS AND CONTROLS: We included 5245 patients with wide-angle retinal imaging from the neonatal intensive care units of 7 institutions as part of the Imaging and Informatics in ROP study. Images were labeled with the clinical diagnoses of plus disease (plus, preplus, no plus), which were documented in the chart, and a reference standard diagnosis was determined by 3 image-based ROP graders and the clinical diagnosis.
methodsDemographics (birth weight, gestational age) and clinical diagnoses for all eye examinations were recorded from each institution. Using an FL approach, a DL model for plus disease classification was trained using only the clinical labels. The 3 class probabilities were then converted into a vascular severity score (VSS) for each eye examination, as well as an "institutional VSS," in which the average of the VSS values assigned to patients' higher severity ("worse") eyes at each examination was calculated for each institution.
main outcome measuresWe compared demographics, clinical diagnoses of plus disease, and institutional VSSs between institutions using the McNemar-Bowker test, 2-proportion Z test, and 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by the Tukey-Kramer test. Single regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between demographics and VSSs.
resultsWe found that the proportion of patients diagnosed with preplus disease varied significantly between institutions (P < 0.001). Using the DL-derived VSS trained on the data from all institutions using FL, we observed differences in the institutional VSS and the level of vascular severity diagnosed as no plus (P < 0.001) across institutions. A significant, inverse relationship between the institutional VSS and mean gestational age was found (P = 0.049, adjusted R
conclusionsA DL-derived ROP VSS developed without sharing data between institutions using FL identified differences in the clinical diagnoses of plus disease and overall levels of ROP severity between institutions. Federated learning may represent a method to standardize clinical diagnoses and provide objective measurements of disease for image-based diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.