Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35304305›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2022

Federated Learning for Multicenter Collaboration in Ophthalmology: Implications for Clinical Diagnosis and Disease Epidemiology.

Adam Hanif, Charles Lu, Ken Chang, Praveer Singh, Aaron S Coyner, James M Brown, Susan Ostmo, Robison V Paul Chan, Daniel Rubin, Michael F Chiang and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A review on federated learning in computational pathology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam HanifDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Charles LuAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ken ChangAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Praveer SinghAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aaron S CoynerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
James M BrownSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Susan OstmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Robison V Paul ChanOphthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniel RubinCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Michael F ChiangNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Center for Clinical Data Science, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
John Peter CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: campbelp@ohsu.edu.
Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity Consortium
Oregon Health & Science University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USStanford University · USUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Kate E Keller · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Endothelial Transmigration in Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationR01EY017011 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARTNETT, MARY ELIZABETH RUTH · 2007 to 2025
$7.7M
Mechanisms of Angiogenesis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY015130 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Mary Elizabeth Ruth Hartnett · 2005 to 2026
$7.6M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
Artificial Intelligence Assisted Panoramic Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Retinopathy of PrematurityR01HD107494 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI John Peter Campbell, Yifan Jian · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
Clinical and genetic analysis of retinopathy of prematurityR01HD107493 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2021 to 2023
$1.8M
Robust AI to develop risk models in retinopathy of prematurity using deep learningR21EY031883 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2020 to 2021
$472k
Artificial intelligence assisted panoramic Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY031331 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER, JIAN, YIFAN · 2020 to 2020
$342k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015130NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017011NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031331NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031883NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107493NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo utilize a deep learning (DL) model trained via federated learning (FL), a method of collaborative training without sharing patient data, to delineate institutional differences in clinician diagnostic paradigms and disease epidemiology in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

designEvaluation of a diagnostic test or technology. SUBJECTS AND CONTROLS: We included 5245 patients with wide-angle retinal imaging from the neonatal intensive care units of 7 institutions as part of the Imaging and Informatics in ROP study. Images were labeled with the clinical diagnoses of plus disease (plus, preplus, no plus), which were documented in the chart, and a reference standard diagnosis was determined by 3 image-based ROP graders and the clinical diagnosis.

methodsDemographics (birth weight, gestational age) and clinical diagnoses for all eye examinations were recorded from each institution. Using an FL approach, a DL model for plus disease classification was trained using only the clinical labels. The 3 class probabilities were then converted into a vascular severity score (VSS) for each eye examination, as well as an "institutional VSS," in which the average of the VSS values assigned to patients' higher severity ("worse") eyes at each examination was calculated for each institution.

main outcome measuresWe compared demographics, clinical diagnoses of plus disease, and institutional VSSs between institutions using the McNemar-Bowker test, 2-proportion Z test, and 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by the Tukey-Kramer test. Single regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between demographics and VSSs.

resultsWe found that the proportion of patients diagnosed with preplus disease varied significantly between institutions (P < 0.001). Using the DL-derived VSS trained on the data from all institutions using FL, we observed differences in the institutional VSS and the level of vascular severity diagnosed as no plus (P < 0.001) across institutions. A significant, inverse relationship between the institutional VSS and mean gestational age was found (P = 0.049, adjusted R

conclusionsA DL-derived ROP VSS developed without sharing data between institutions using FL identified differences in the clinical diagnoses of plus disease and overall levels of ROP severity between institutions. Federated learning may represent a method to standardize clinical diagnoses and provide objective measurements of disease for image-based diseases.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyRetinopathy of PrematurityGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornReproducibility of ResultsRetinaDeep learningEpidemiologyFederated learningRetinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID35304305
PMCPMC9357070
OpenAlexW4220753950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.