ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022
Upper Digestive Disease App for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mobile applications in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Applications of artificial intelligence in postoperative surveillance and management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Influence of patient engagement technology on reported perioperative experiences of patients undergoing lung resection.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- PRO-Angoff method for remote standard setting: establishing clinical thresholds for the upper digestive disease tool.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Developing & integrating a mobile application tool into a survivorship clinic for esophageal cancer patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) can enable communication of symptoms, function, and quality of life. Mobile devices capture PROs electronically (ePRO). The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of collecting ePROs in esophagectomy patients using the upper digestive disease application (UDD App).
methodsA single-group, mixed methods design was used to address the study purposes. A convenience sample of esophagectomy patients was recruited after resumption of an oral diet from January 2020 to December 2020. Demographic characteristics (age, sex) and clinical data (surgical procedure) were obtained after informed consent. Participants used the UDD App for 1 year, followed by scripted telephone interviews. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses of the interviews were the primary data analyses.
resultsSixty-four patients were enrolled (80% male; 62.9 ± 12 years old). Of these, 50 patients initiated 108 evaluations through the UDD app, with 98% completing the questionnaire on the first attempt, indicating feasibility. A subset of 32 patients participated in the scripted telephone interview. Participants (74%) reported high computer literacy; all reported that using the UDD App was easier than or equivalent to a paper form. Interview themes revealed value of the app for identifying problems and enhanced communication with providers and caregivers, with an overall appreciation for the convenience of remote monitoring but concerns about data privacy.
conclusionsThe UDD App is feasible and acceptable for collecting ePROs in esophagectomy patients. Future work will determine whether the UDD App improves symptoms, function, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35304110What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.