ArticleSurgery2022
Preoperative computed tomography for acutely incarcerated ventral or inguinal hernia.
Article in Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of usefulness of manual reduction in the management of adult acute irreducible abdominal wall hernia: a study from a community-based teaching hospital.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Prediction of bowel resection in acute irreducible inguinal hernia: a retrospective analysis of preoperative computed tomography and clinical risk factors.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
- Inflammatory markers as predictors of severity in adult incarcerated groin hernias - a retrospective comparative study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic-enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for incarcerated inguinal hernia: a paradigm shift toward precision emergency herniology.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe utility of preoperative computed tomography for urgent abdominal wall hernia repair is unclear. This study tests the hypothesis that there is no difference in patient outcomes for acutely incarcerated ventral or inguinal hernias diagnosed by preoperative computed tomography versus clinical assessment alone.
methodsThis retrospective cohort analysis included 270 adult patients undergoing urgent repair of ventral or inguinal hernia. Demographics, risk factors for complications, operative management strategies, and 1-year outcomes were compared between patients with (n = 179) versus without (n = 91) preoperative computed tomography.
resultsAmong 179 preoperative computed tomography scans, 15 (8.4%) were ordered by surgeons, and all others were ordered by referring providers. The computed tomography and no computed tomography groups had similar age (58 vs 58 years, P = .77), body mass index (30.7 vs 30.6 kg/m
conclusionThe performance of preoperative computed tomography was associated with a longer interval between admission and incision and no differences in mesh placement, mesh type, or 1-year patient outcomes. These results support the safety of performing urgent repair of acutely incarcerated ventral or inguinal hernias based on clinical assessment alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.