Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303898›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2022

Using experience to create evidence: a mixed methods process evaluation of the new free family planning policy in Burkina Faso.

Lalique Browne, Sarah Cooper, Cheick Tiendrebeogo, Frank Bicaba, Alice Bila, Abel Bicaba, Thomas Druetz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes Before and Into the COVID-19 Pandemic in Burkina Faso and Kenya: Evidence From Panel Data.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lalique Browne *School of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Sarah Cooper *School of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Cheick TiendrebeogoSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Frank BicabaSociété d'Études et de Recherche en Santé Publique (SERSAP), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Alice BilaSociété d'Études et de Recherche en Santé Publique (SERSAP), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Abel BicabaSociété d'Études et de Recherche en Santé Publique (SERSAP), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Thomas DruetzSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, C.P 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada. thomas.druetz@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-4286
Université de Montréal · CAInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFAix-Marseille Université · FRTulane University · US

Funding

International Development Research Centre 108553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019, Burkina Faso was one of the first countries in Sub-Saharan Africa to introduce a free family planning (FP) policy. This process evaluation aims to identify obstacles and facilitators to its implementation, examine its coverage in the targeted population after six months, and investigate its influence on the perceived quality of FP services.

methodsThis process evaluation was conducted from November 2019 through March 2020 in the two regions of Burkina Faso where the new policy was introduced as a pilot. Mixed methods were used with a convergent design. Semi-directed interviews were conducted with the Ministry of Health (n = 3), healthcare workers (n = 10), and women aged 15-49 years (n = 10). Surveys were also administered to the female members of 696 households randomly selected from four health districts (n = 901).

resultsImplementation obstacles include insufficient communication, shortages of consumables and contraceptives, and delays in reimbursement from the government. The main facilitators were previous experience with free healthcare policies, good acceptability in the population, and support from local associations. Six months after its introduction, only 50% of the surveyed participants knew about the free FP policy. Higher education level, being sexually active or in a relationship, having recently seen a healthcare professional, and possession of a radio significantly increased the odds of knowing. Of the participants, 39% continued paying for FP services despite the new policy, mainly because of stock shortages forcing them to buy their contraceptive products elsewhere. Increased waiting time and shorter consultations were also reported.

conclusionSix months after its introduction, the free FP policy still has gaps in its implementation, as women continue to spend money for FP services and have little knowledge of the policy, particularly in the Cascades region. While its use is reportedly increasing, addressing implementation issues could further improve women's access to contraception.

Indexed as

Family Planning PolicyAdolescentAdultBurkina FasoContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultBurkina FasoFamily planningGratuityHealth policyImplementationProcess evaluationReproductive healthUser fee removal

Identifiers

PMID35303898
PMCPMC8932047
OpenAlexW4220893554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.