Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2022

Placing equity at the heart of eHealth implementation: a qualitative pilot study.

Milena Heinsch, Campbell Tickner, Frances Kay-Lambkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  7. A New eHealth Investment Appraisal Framework for Africa: Validation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milena HeinschCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. milena.heinsch@newcastle.edu.au.
Campbell TicknerCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Frances Kay-LambkinCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing urgency to tackle issues of equity and justice in the implementation of eHealth technologies.

methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with 19 multidisciplinary health professionals to explore the implementation and uptake of eHealth technologies in practice. The aim of this article was to examine in more detail issues of equity and justice in the implementation and uptake of eHealth technologies in practice. Results were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step reflexive thematic analysis approach.

resultsNancy Fraser's concept of social justice is introduced as a novel framework for inquiry into the implementation of digital health services. Health professionals reported that eHealth offered their clients a greater sense of safety, convenience, and flexibility, allowing them to determine the nature and pace of their healthcare, and giving them more control over their treatment and recovery. However, they also expressed concerns about the use of eHealth with clients whose home environment is unsafe. Application of Fraser's framework revealed that eHealth technologies may not always provide a secure clinical space in which the voices of vulnerable clients can be recognised and heard. It also highlighted critical systemic and cultural barriers that hinder the representation of clients' voices in the decision to use eHealth technologies and perpetuate inequalities in the distribution of eHealth services.

conclusionsTo facilitate broad participation, eHealth tools need to be adaptable to the needs and circumstances of diverse groups. Future implementation science efforts must also be directed at identifying and addressing the underlying structures that hinder equitable recognition, representation, and distribution in the implementation of eHealth resources.

Indexed as

TelemedicineDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchDigital healtheHealthEquityImplementationSocial justiceTheory

Identifiers

PMID35303883
PMCPMC8931179
OpenAlexW4220804290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.