Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303820›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical imaging2022

The impact of cardiopulmonary hemodynamic factors in volumetry for pulmonary nodule management.

Erique Guedes Pinto, Diana Penha, Bruno Hochhegger, Colin Monaghan, Edson Marchiori, Luís Taborda-Barata, Klaus Irion

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Erique Guedes PintoUniversidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. ericguedespinto@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-9270
Diana PenhaUniversidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3358-6875
Bruno HochheggerPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-4636
Colin MonaghanImaging Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Edson MarchioriFederal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-7380
Luís Taborda-BarataUniversidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-8890
Klaus IrionImaging Department, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-7879
University of Beira Interior · PTUniversity of Liverpool · GBPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acceptance of coronary CT angiogram (CCTA) scans in the management of stable angina has led to an exponential increase in studies performed and reported incidental findings, including pulmonary nodules (PN). Using low-dose CT scans, volumetry tools are used in growth assessment and risk stratification of PN between 5 and 8 mm in diameter. Volumetry of PN could also benefit from the increased temporal resolution of CCTA scans, potentially expediting clinical decisions when an incidental PN is first detected on a CCTA scan, and allow for better resource management and planning in a Radiology department. This study aims to investigate how cardiopulmonary hemodynamic factors impact the volumetry of PN using CCTA scans. These factors include the cardiac phase, vascular distance from the main pulmonary artery (MPA) to the nodule, difference of the MPA diameter between systole and diastole, nodule location, and cardiomegaly presence. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo readers reviewed all CCTA scans performed from 2016 to 2019 in a tertiary hospital and detected PN measuring between 5 and 8 mm in diameter. Each observer measured each nodule using two different software packages and in systole and diastole. A multiple linear regression model was applied, and inter-observer and inter-software agreement were assessed using intraclass correlation.

resultsA total of 195 nodules from 107 patients were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional and observational study. The regression model identified the vascular distance (p < 0.001), the difference of the MPA diameter between systole and diastole (p < 0.001), and the location within the lower or posterior thirds of the field of view (p < 0.001 each) as affecting the volume measurement. The cardiac phase was not significant in the model. There was a very high inter-observer agreement but no reasonable inter-software agreement between measurements.

conclusionsPN volumetry using CCTA scans seems to be sensitive to cardiopulmonary hemodynamic changes independently of the cardiac phase. These might also be relevant to non-gated scans, such as during PN follow-up. The cardiopulmonary hemodynamic changes are a new limiting factor to PN volumetry. In addition, when a patient experiences an acute or deteriorating cardiopulmonary disease during PN follow-up, these hemodynamic changes could affect the PN growth estimation.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleCoronary AngiographyCross-Sectional StudiesHemodynamicsHumansRetrospective StudiesCardiac-gated imaging techniques [E01.370.350.130.500Lung neoplasms [C04.588.894.797.520Pulmonary circulation [G09.330.100.770Radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted [E01.158.600.680

Identifiers

PMID35303820
PMCPMC8932130
OpenAlexW4220897691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.