Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303763›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2022

Character strengths and fluid intelligence.

André Kretzschmar, Lisa Wagner, Fabian Gander, Jennifer Hofmann, René T Proyer, Willibald Ruch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Character strengths and fluid intelligence.Journal of personality · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André KretzschmarDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-1145
Lisa WagnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1925-2676
Fabian GanderDepartment of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2204-8828
Jennifer HofmannDepartment of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3972-3831
René T ProyerDepartment of Psychology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7426-4939
Willibald RuchDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5368-3616

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 100014_172723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch on the associations between cognitive and noncognitive personality traits has widely neglected character strengths, that means positively and morally valued personality traits that constitute good character.

methodThe present study aimed to bridge this gap by studying the associations between character strengths and fluid intelligence using different operationalizations of character strengths (including self- and informant-reports) and fluid intelligence in children, adolescents, and adults.

resultsThe results, based on four samples (N = 193/290/330/324), suggested that morally valued personality traits are independent of fluid intelligence, with the exception of love of learning, which showed small but robust positive relationships with fluid intelligence across all samples.

conclusionsNonetheless, we argue for further research on the associations with other cognitive abilities and interactions between character strengths and intelligence when examining their relationships with external criteria.

Indexed as

CharacterIntelligenceAdolescentAdultAptitudeChildCognitionHumansLearningcharacter strengthscognitive abilityvalidityVIA-ISVIA-Youth

Identifiers

PMID35303763
PMCPMC9790612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.