Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303163›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma using the Brigham and Women's staging system: a cost analysis.

Patrick L Quinn, Jin K Kim, Vishnu Prasath, Neal Panse, Thomas J Knackstedt, Ravi J Chokshi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick L QuinnDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jin K KimDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 205 South Orange Ave, F1222, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Vishnu PrasathDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 205 South Orange Ave, F1222, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Neal PanseDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 205 South Orange Ave, F1222, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Thomas J KnackstedtDepartment of Dermatology, Metrohealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ravi J ChokshiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 205 South Orange Ave, F1222, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. chokshrj@njms.rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-4942
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USMetroHealth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective is to determine the cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) according to the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) Tumor Staging system. A decision analysis was utilized to examine costs and outcomes associated with the use of SLNB in patients with high-risk head and neck CSCC. Decision tree outcome probabilities were obtained from published literature. Costs were derived from Medicare reimbursement rates (US$) and effectiveness was represented by quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with a willingness-to-pay set at $100,000 per QALY gained. SLNB was found to be a cost-effective tool for patients with T3 tumors, with an ICER of $18,110.57. Withholding SLNB was the dominant strategy for both T2a and T2b lesions, with ICERs of - $2468.99 and - $16,694.00, respectively. Withholding SLNB remained the dominant strategy when examining immunosuppressed patients with T2a or T2b lesions. In patients with head and neck CSCC, those with T3 or T2b lesions with additional risk factors not accounted for in the staging system alone, may be considered for SLNB, while in other tumor stages it may be impractical. SLNB should only be offered on an individual patient basis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsAgedCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansMedicareNeoplasm StagingSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckUnited StatesCost-effectivenessCutaneous squamous cell carcinomaDecision analysisSentinel lymph nodeSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID35303163
OpenAlexW4221093390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.