Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303158›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Comparison of laparoscopic and open colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jini Wu, Bo Li, Shiliang Tu, Boan Zheng, Bingchen Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jini WuGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
Bo LiWujiaqu Modern Anorectal Hospital of the Sixth Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Wujiaqu, China.
Shiliang TuGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
Boan ZhengGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
Bingchen ChenGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China. 672462306@qq.com.
Hangzhou Medical College · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNXinjiang Production and Construction Corps · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examined the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenic flexure colon cancer (SFCC) surgery.

methodSystematic literature searches were performed in PubMed and Ovid to compare laparoscopic and open colectomy for SFCC. The last search was conducted on November 7, 2021. Surgical and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed. This meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software (v 5.3).

resultsThis study included seven publications with 2397 patients published between 2011 and 2021. A significant difference in operative time was seen in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.01, WMD = 50.13, 95%CI [10.32, 89.94], I

conclusionThe laparoscopic procedure is clinically safe and feasible for SFCC. It shows the advantages in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and overall complications, and the long-term survival outcomes would not be affected. Randomized clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted in the future for further investigation.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColon, TransverseLaparoscopyColectomyHumansOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeColon cancerComplicationsLaparoscopicOpenSplenic flexureSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35303158
OpenAlexW4221071002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.