Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35303037›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Sustained reduction in numbers of Australian fur seal pups: Implications for future population monitoring.

Rebecca R McIntosh, Karina J Sorrell, Sam Thalmann, Anthony Mitchell, Rachael Gray, Harley Schinagl, John P Y Arnould, Peter Dann, Roger Kirkwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Declining Abundance and Variable Condition of Fur Seal (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Pacific Gulls (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca R McIntoshConservation Department, Phillip Island Nature Parks, Cowes, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3159-9581
Karina J SorrellSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-4221
Sam ThalmannDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Anthony MitchellDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Orbost, Victoria, Australia.
Rachael GraySydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Harley SchinaglConservation Department, Phillip Island Nature Parks, Cowes, Victoria, Australia.
John P Y ArnouldSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Peter DannConservation Department, Phillip Island Nature Parks, Cowes, Victoria, Australia.
Roger KirkwoodSouth Australian Research and Development Institute-Aquatic Sciences, West Beach, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fur seal populations in the Southern Hemisphere were plundered in the late 1700s and early 1800s to provide fur for a clothing industry. Millions of seals were killed resulting in potentially major ecosystem changes across the Southern Hemisphere, the consequences of which are unknown today. Following more than a century of population suppression, partly through on-going harvesting, many of the fur seal populations started to recover in the late 1900s. Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus), one of the most geographically constrained fur seal species, followed this trend. From the 1940s to 1986, pup production remained at approximately 10,000 per year, then significant growth commenced. By 2007, live pup abundance had recovered to approximately 21,400 per year and recovery was expected to continue However, a species-wide survey in 2013 recorded a 20% decline, to approximately 16,500 live pups. It was not known if this decline was due to 2013 being a poor breeding year or a true population reduction. Here we report the results of a population-wide survey conducted in 2017 and annual monitoring at the most productive colony, Seal Rocks, Victoria that recorded a large decline in live pup abundance (-28%). Sustained lower pup numbers at Seal Rocks from annual counts between 2012-2017 (mean = 2908 ± 372 SD), as well as the population-wide estimate of 16,903 live pups in 2017, suggest that the pup numbers for the total population have remained at the lower level observed in 2013 and that the 5-yearly census results are not anomalies or representative of poor breeding seasons. Potential reasons for the decline, which did not occur range-wide but predominantly in the most populated and long-standing breeding sites, are discussed. To enhance adaptive management of this species, methods for future monitoring of the population are also presented. Australian fur seals occupy several distinct regions influenced by different currents and upwellings: range-wide pup abundance monitoring enables comparisons of ecosystem status across these regions. Forces driving change in Australian fur seal pup numbers are likely to play across other marine ecosystems, particularly in the Southern Hemisphere where most fur seals live.

Indexed as

CaniformiaFur SealsSeals, EarlessAnimalsAustraliaEcosystemPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID35303037
PMCPMC8932563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.