Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302841›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Dynamics of an impacting emulsion droplet.

Maher Damak, Jolet de Ruiter, Sreedath Panat, Kripa K Varanasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The limit of droplet rebound angle.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ultrahigh efficient emulsification with drag-reducing liquid gating interfacial behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maher DamakDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-3018
Jolet de RuiterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-4132
Sreedath PanatDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6929-202X
Kripa K VaranasiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6846-152X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emulsions are widely used in agriculture where oil-based pesticides are sprayed as an emulsion. However, emulsion droplets can bounce off hydrophobic plant surfaces, leading to major health and environmental issues as pesticides pollute water sources and soils. Here, we report an unexpected transition from bouncing to sticking to bouncing as the droplet impact speed increases. We show that the physics are governed by an in situ, self-generated lubrication of the surface leading to a suction force from the nascent oil layer around the droplet. We demonstrate that this phenomenon can be controlled by a careful balance of three time scales: the contact time of the droplet, the impregnation time scale of the oil, and the oil ridge formation time scale. We lastly build a design map to precisely control the bouncing of droplets and the oil coverage of the target surface. These insights have broad applicability in agriculture, cooling sprays, combustion, and additive manufacturing.

Identifiers

PMID35302841
PMCPMC8932654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.