Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302683›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Spatiotemporally resolved multivariate pattern analysis for M/EEG.

Cameron Higgins, Diego Vidaurre, Nils Kolling, Yunzhe Liu, Tim Behrens, Mark Woolrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Patterns of Social Pain in the Brain-Wide Representations Across Social Contexts.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. ADA: A decoding algorithm for temporally-variable brain responses.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cameron HigginsWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-5325
Diego VidaurreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9650-2229
Nils KollingWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-6966
Yunzhe LiuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-9403
Tim BehrensWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0048-1177
Mark WoolrichWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8460-8854

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R010803/1Medical Research Council RG89702Medical Research Council RG94383Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104765/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 106183/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 214314/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust 215573/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust 219525/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging goal in neuroscience is tracking what information is represented in brain activity over time as a participant completes some task. While electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) offer millisecond temporal resolution of how activity patterns emerge and evolve, standard decoding methods present significant barriers to interpretability as they obscure the underlying spatial and temporal activity patterns. We instead propose the use of a generative encoding model framework that simultaneously infers the multivariate spatial patterns of activity and the variable timing at which these patterns emerge on individual trials. An encoding model inversion maps from these parameters to the equivalent decoding model, allowing predictions to be made about unseen test data in the same way as in standard decoding methodology. These SpatioTemporally Resolved MVPA (STRM) models can be flexibly applied to a wide variety of experimental paradigms, including classification and regression tasks. We show that these models provide insightful maps of the activity driving predictive accuracy metrics; demonstrate behaviourally meaningful variation in the timing of pattern emergence on individual trials; and achieve predictive accuracies that are either equivalent or surpass those achieved by more widely used methods. This provides a new avenue for investigating the brain's representational dynamics and could ultimately support more flexible experimental designs in the future.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetoencephalographyMultivariate AnalysisdecodingEEGencodingMEGsingle trial task dynamics

Identifiers

PMID35302683
PMCPMC9188977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.