Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302640›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2022

Systems approaches reveal that ABCB and PIN proteins mediate co-dependent auxin efflux.

Nathan L Mellor, Ute Voß, Alexander Ware, George Janes, Duncan Barrack, Anthony Bishopp, Malcolm J Bennett, Markus Geisler, Darren M Wells, Leah R Band

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Genome Identification and Expression Profiling of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. RNA-Seq Transcriptome Analysis and Evolution ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathan L MellorDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0498-0996
Ute VoßDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2124-9334
Alexander WareDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0723-178X
George JanesDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0318-3386
Duncan BarrackDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4470-1920
Anthony BishoppDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-9542
Malcolm J BennettDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0475-390X
Markus GeislerDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg CH-1700, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6641-5810
Darren M WellsDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4246-4909
Leah R BandDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-1117
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M019837/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the B family of membrane-bound ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters represent key components of the auxin efflux machinery in plants. Over the last two decades, experimental studies have shown that modifying ATP-binding cassette sub-family B (ABCB) expression affects auxin distribution and plant phenotypes. However, precisely how ABCB proteins transport auxin in conjunction with the more widely studied family of PIN-formed (PIN) auxin efflux transporters is unclear, and studies using heterologous systems have produced conflicting results. Here, we integrate ABCB localization data into a multicellular model of auxin transport in the Arabidopsis thaliana root tip to predict how ABCB-mediated auxin transport impacts organ-scale auxin distribution. We use our model to test five potential ABCB-PIN regulatory interactions, simulating the auxin dynamics for each interaction and quantitatively comparing the predictions with experimental images of the DII-VENUS auxin reporter in wild-type and abcb single and double loss-of-function mutants. Only specific ABCB-PIN regulatory interactions result in predictions that recreate the experimentally observed DII-VENUS distributions and long-distance auxin transport. Our results suggest that ABCBs enable auxin efflux independently of PINs; however, PIN-mediated auxin efflux is predominantly through a co-dependent efflux where co-localized with ABCBs.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphateATP-Binding Cassette TransportersBiological TransportIndoleacetic AcidsPlant RootsAdenosine TriphosphateArabidopsis ProteinsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersIndoleacetic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35302640
PMCPMC9134068
OpenAlexW4220698762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.