Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302505›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

User Experiences With an SMS Text Messaging Program for Smoking Cessation: Qualitative Study.

Alexandra Budenz, Kisha Coa, Emily Grenen, Brian Keefe, Amy Sanders, Kara P Wiseman, Maria Roditis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra BudenzTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-9785
Kisha CoaCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Woodlawn, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-259X
Emily GrenenICF, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9189-5812
Brian KeefeICF, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-4219
Amy SandersICF, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-6289
Kara P WisemanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-0899
Maria RoditisTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-024X

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400002BNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400002CNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health strategies for smoking cessation (eg, SMS text messaging-based interventions) have been shown to be effective in helping smokers quit. However, further research is needed to better understand user experiences with these platforms.

objectiveThis qualitative study aims to explore the experiences of real-world users of a publicly available smoking cessation program (SmokefreeTXT).

methodsSemistructured phone interviews were conducted with 36 SmokefreeTXT users between March and July 2014. Of these 36 participants, 50% (18/36) of participants completed the SmokefreeTXT program (ie, did not opt out of the program before the 6- to 8-week completion period), and 50% (18/36) did not complete the program (ie, requested to opt out of the program before the completion period). Interview questions focused on smoking behaviors, quitting history, opinions on the program's content and structure, answering assessment questions, using keywords, reasons for opting out, and perceived usefulness of the program for quitting smoking. A thematic content analysis was conducted, with a focus on themes to increase program engagement and optimization.

resultsThe findings highlighted features of the program that participants found beneficial, as well as some elements that showed opportunities for improvement to boost program retention and successful cessation. Specifically, most participants found the SmokefreeTXT program to be convenient and supportive of cessation; however, some found the messages to be repetitive and reported a desire for more flexibility based on their readiness to quit and cessation progress. We also found that program completion did not necessarily indicate successful smoking cessation and that program opt out, which might be interpreted as a less positive outcome, may occur because of successful cessation. Finally, several participants reported using SmokefreeTXT together with other evidence-based cessation methods or non-evidence-based strategies.

conclusionsQualitative interviews with real-world SmokefreeTXT users showed high program acceptability, engagement with program features, and perceived utility for smoking cessation. Our findings directly informed several program updates, such as adding an adaptive quit date feature and offering supplemental information on live support services for users who prefer human interaction during the cessation process. The study has implications for other digital tobacco cessation interventions and highlights important topics that warrant future research, such as the relationship between program engagement (eg, opt out and retention) and successful cessation.

Indexed as

mobile phonequalitative researchsmoking cessationtext messaging interventions

Identifiers

PMID35302505
PMCPMC8976256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.