ArticleJMIR formative research2022
Examining the Influence on Perceptions of Endometriosis via Analysis of Social Media Posts: Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Media Health Information Formats and Endometriosis Treatment-Seeking Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Trial
- Interpretations of Menstrual Blood Appearance and Diagnostic Potential Among Social Media Users: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Social Media Listening Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Humor in Social Media Health Communication: A Systematic Review of Strategic Uses and Effects.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Care of Patients with Endometriosis: A Scoping Review.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- How Women with Endometriosis Use Social Media for Support and Self-Management: An Analysis of Reddit Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Endometriosis Communities on Reddit: Quantitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Approach to external cephalic version through social media: experience from a tertiary center in Brazil.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- #infertility in Brazil: an analysis of authorship and post content on Instagram.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024Article
- Understanding AI's Role in Endometriosis Patient Education and Evaluating Its Information and Accuracy: Systematic Review.JMIR AI · 2024Review
- Attitudes and perceptions of affected women towards endocrine endometriosis therapy: an international survey based on free-word association networks.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Social Media, Endometriosis, and Evidence-Based Information: An Analysis of Instagram Content.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Co-Existence of Endometriosis with Ovarian Dermoid Cysts: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Users' Concerns About Endometriosis on Social Media: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Following Fibroids: An Analysis of Social Media Narratives.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial media platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, are increasingly being used to share health-related information by "influencers," regular users, and institutions alike. While patients may benefit in various ways from these interactions, little is known about the types of endometriosis-related information published on social media. As digital opinion leaders influence the perceptions of their followers, physicians need to be aware about ideas and beliefs that are available online, in order to address possible misconceptions and provide optimal patient care.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and analyze frequent endometriosis-related discussion topics on social media in order to offer caregivers insight into commonly discussed subject matter and aspects.
methodsWe performed a systematic search using predefined parameters. Using the term "endometriosis" in Facebook's search function and a social media search engine, a list of Facebook pages was generated. A list of Instagram accounts was generated using the terms "endometriosis" and "endo" in Instagram's search function. Pages and accounts in English with 5000 or more followers or likes were included. Nonpublic, unrelated, or inactive pages and accounts were excluded. For each account, the most recent 10 posts were identified and categorized by two independent examiners using qualitative content analysis. User engagement was calculated using the numbers of interactions (ie, shares, likes, and comments) for each post, stratified by the number of followers.
resultsA total of 39 Facebook pages and 43 Instagram accounts with approximately 1.4 million followers were identified. Hospitals and medical centers made up 15% (6/39) of the Facebook pages and 5% (2/43) of the Instagram accounts. Top accounts had up to 111,600 (Facebook) and 41,400 (Instagram) followers. A total of 820 posts were analyzed. On Facebook, most posts were categorized as "awareness" (101/390, 25.9% of posts), "education and research" (71/390, 18.2%), and "promotion" (64/390, 16.4%). On Instagram, the top categories were "inspiration and support" (120/430, 27.9% of posts), "awareness" (72/430, 16.7%), and "personal story" (72/430, 16.7%). The frequency of most categories differed significantly between platforms. User engagement was higher on Instagram than on Facebook (3.20% vs 0.97% of followers per post). On Instagram, the highest percentage of users engaged with posts categorized as "humor" (mean 4.19%, SD 4.53%), "personal story" (mean 3.02%, SD 4.95%), and "inspiration and support" (mean 2.83%, SD 3.08%). On Facebook, posts in the categories "awareness" (mean 2.05%, SD 15.56%), "humor" (mean 0.91%, SD 1.07%), and "inspiration and support" (mean 0.56%, SD 1.37%) induced the most user engagement. Posts made by hospitals and medical centers generated higher user engagement than posts by regular accounts on Facebook (mean 1.44%, SD 1.11% vs mean 0.88%, SD 2.71% of followers per post) and Instagram (mean 3.33%, SD 1.21% vs mean 3.19%, SD 2.52% of followers per post).
conclusionsFacebook and Instagram are widely used to share endometriosis-related information among a large number of users. Most posts offer inspiration or support, spread awareness about the disease, or cover personal issues. Followers mostly engage with posts with a humoristic, supportive, and awareness-generating nature. Health care providers should be aware about the topics discussed online, as this may lead to an increased understanding of the needs and demands of digitally proficient patients with endometriosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.