Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302501›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Examining the Influence on Perceptions of Endometriosis via Analysis of Social Media Posts: Cross-sectional Study.

Julian Matthias Metzler, Dimitrios Rafail Kalaitzopoulos, Laurin Burla, Gabriel Schaer, Patrick Imesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social Media Health Information Formats and Endometriosis Treatment-Seeking Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. How Women with Endometriosis Use Social Media for Support and Self-Management: An Analysis of Reddit Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Endometriosis Communities on Reddit: Quantitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Following Fibroids: An Analysis of Social Media Narratives.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian Matthias MetzlerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-8577
Dimitrios Rafail KalaitzopoulosDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-1308
Laurin BurlaDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-3272
Gabriel SchaerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-3670
Patrick ImeschDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-6005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, are increasingly being used to share health-related information by "influencers," regular users, and institutions alike. While patients may benefit in various ways from these interactions, little is known about the types of endometriosis-related information published on social media. As digital opinion leaders influence the perceptions of their followers, physicians need to be aware about ideas and beliefs that are available online, in order to address possible misconceptions and provide optimal patient care.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and analyze frequent endometriosis-related discussion topics on social media in order to offer caregivers insight into commonly discussed subject matter and aspects.

methodsWe performed a systematic search using predefined parameters. Using the term "endometriosis" in Facebook's search function and a social media search engine, a list of Facebook pages was generated. A list of Instagram accounts was generated using the terms "endometriosis" and "endo" in Instagram's search function. Pages and accounts in English with 5000 or more followers or likes were included. Nonpublic, unrelated, or inactive pages and accounts were excluded. For each account, the most recent 10 posts were identified and categorized by two independent examiners using qualitative content analysis. User engagement was calculated using the numbers of interactions (ie, shares, likes, and comments) for each post, stratified by the number of followers.

resultsA total of 39 Facebook pages and 43 Instagram accounts with approximately 1.4 million followers were identified. Hospitals and medical centers made up 15% (6/39) of the Facebook pages and 5% (2/43) of the Instagram accounts. Top accounts had up to 111,600 (Facebook) and 41,400 (Instagram) followers. A total of 820 posts were analyzed. On Facebook, most posts were categorized as "awareness" (101/390, 25.9% of posts), "education and research" (71/390, 18.2%), and "promotion" (64/390, 16.4%). On Instagram, the top categories were "inspiration and support" (120/430, 27.9% of posts), "awareness" (72/430, 16.7%), and "personal story" (72/430, 16.7%). The frequency of most categories differed significantly between platforms. User engagement was higher on Instagram than on Facebook (3.20% vs 0.97% of followers per post). On Instagram, the highest percentage of users engaged with posts categorized as "humor" (mean 4.19%, SD 4.53%), "personal story" (mean 3.02%, SD 4.95%), and "inspiration and support" (mean 2.83%, SD 3.08%). On Facebook, posts in the categories "awareness" (mean 2.05%, SD 15.56%), "humor" (mean 0.91%, SD 1.07%), and "inspiration and support" (mean 0.56%, SD 1.37%) induced the most user engagement. Posts made by hospitals and medical centers generated higher user engagement than posts by regular accounts on Facebook (mean 1.44%, SD 1.11% vs mean 0.88%, SD 2.71% of followers per post) and Instagram (mean 3.33%, SD 1.21% vs mean 3.19%, SD 2.52% of followers per post).

conclusionsFacebook and Instagram are widely used to share endometriosis-related information among a large number of users. Most posts offer inspiration or support, spread awareness about the disease, or cover personal issues. Followers mostly engage with posts with a humoristic, supportive, and awareness-generating nature. Health care providers should be aware about the topics discussed online, as this may lead to an increased understanding of the needs and demands of digitally proficient patients with endometriosis.

Indexed as

endometriosisengagementFacebookinfluencerInstagramsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35302501
PMCPMC8976247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.