Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302259›Full record

ReviewRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2022

Current global perspectives on silicosis-Convergence of old and newly emergent hazards.

Ryan F Hoy, Mohamed F Jeebhay, Catherine Cavalin, Weihong Chen, Robert A Cohen, Elizabeth Fireman, Leonard H T Go, Antonio León-Jiménez, Alfredo Menéndez-Navarro, Marcos Ribeiro and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Silicosis from dry-cutting engineered stone in the fabrication of countertops.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Ryan F HoySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9150-9440
Mohamed F JeebhayOccupational Medicine Division and Centre for Environmental & Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6656-9193
Catherine CavalinCNRS (IRISSO, UMR CNRS-INRAE 7170-1427), Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL, Soutien à la mobilité internationale (SMI) du CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-3031
Weihong ChenKey Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Environmental Protection, and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Robert A CohenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Elizabeth FiremanInstitute of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Leonard H T GoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Antonio León-JiménezPulmonology, Allergy and Thoracic Surgery Department, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-9588
Alfredo Menéndez-NavarroDepartment of History of Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Marcos RibeiroPulmonary Department, Universidade Estadual de Londrina: Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Paul-André RosentalCenter for History at Sciences Po, Sciences Po, Paris, France.
Northwestern University · USHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar · ESInstitut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris · FRMadrid Institute for Advanced Studies · ESMinistry of Ecology and Environment · CNTel Aviv University · ILThe Alfred Hospital · AUUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicosis not a disease of the past. It is an irreversible, fibrotic lung disease specifically caused by exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) dust. Over 20,000 incident cases of silicosis were identified in 2017 and millions of workers continue to be exposed to RCS. Identified case numbers are however a substantial underestimation due to deficiencies in reporting systems and occupational respiratory health surveillance programmes in many countries. Insecure workers, immigrants and workers in small businesses are at particular risk of more intense RCS exposure. Much of the focus of research and prevention activities has been on the mining sector. Hazardous RCS exposure however occurs in a wide range of occupational setting which receive less attention, in particular the construction industry. Recent outbreaks of silicosis associated with the fabrication of domestic kitchen benchtops from high-silica content artificial stone have been particularly notable because of the young age of affected workers, short duration of RCS exposure and often rapid disease progression. Developments in nanotechnology and hydraulic fracking provide further examples of how rapid changes in technology and industrial processes require governments to maintain constant vigilance to identify and control potential sources of RCS exposure. Despite countries around the world dealing with similar issues related to RCS exposure, there is an absence of sustained global public health response including lack of consensus of an occupational exposure limit that would provide protection to workers. Although there are complex challenges, global elimination of silicosis must remain the goal.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureSilicosisDustHumansSilicon DioxideDustSilicon Dioxideepidemiologyoccupational medicinepreventionpublic healthsilicosis

Identifiers

PMID35302259
PMCPMC9310854
OpenAlexW4221080239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.