Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301826›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Effects of β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on muscle mass, function, and other outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Carla M Prado, Camila E Orsso, Suzette L Pereira, Philip J Atherton, Nicolaas E P Deutz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07660991 (Pulmoner Rehabilitasyon Alan akciğer Nakil adaylarında hidroksimetilbütirat Takviyesinin değerlendirilmesi), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07660991 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pulmoner Rehabilitasyon Alan akciğer Nakil adaylarında hidroksimetilbütirat Takviyesinin değerlendirilmesi

TypeinterventionalSponsorOkan UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsLung Transplantation, Pulmoner Rehabilitation, Lun Transplant CandidatesArmsHMB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM clinical guidelines for cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Effects of exercise with or withoutFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Perioperative immunonutrition intervention on postoperative outcomes among gynaecological cancer patients under enhanced recovery after surgery setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meeting physical activity guidelines in conjunction with higher protein intake: associations with appendicular lean soft tissue index in middle aged adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Carla M PradoHuman Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3609-5641
Camila E OrssoHuman Nutrition Research Unit, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-0528
Suzette L PereiraResearch and Development, Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH, USA.
Philip J AthertonCentre of Metabolism, Ageing & Physiology (COMAP), Medical Research Council (MRC) Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research (CMAR), and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nicolaas E P DeutzCenter for Translational Research in Aging and Longevity, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
University of Alberta · CAAbbott (United States) · USNational Institute for Health Research · GBTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Campus Alberta Innovation Research Chair ProgramCIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low muscle mass is prevalent among patients with cancer and a predictor of adverse clinical outcomes. To counteract muscle loss, β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation has been proposed as a potential therapy for older adults and various diseases states. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects and safety of HMB supplementation in relation to muscle mass and function and other clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, ProQuest, and grey literature for reports published from inception to December 2021 was conducted. Included studies provided supplements containing any dose of HMB to adult patients with active cancer. A synthesis without meta-analysis was conducted using a vote-counting approach based solely on the direction of the effect (i.e. regardless of statistical significance). Risk of bias was assessed for each outcome domain, and evidence from higher-quality studies (i.e. those with either low or moderate risk of bias) was examined. Safety was evaluated using both lower-quality and higher-quality studies. Fifteen studies were included, in which six were randomized controlled trials in patients with various cancer types and treatments. Studies prescribed HMB combined with amino acids (73.3%), HMB in oral nutritional supplements (20.0%), or both supplement types (6.7%); Ca-HMB doses of 3.0 g/day were provided in 80.0% of the studies. Four studies had high risk of bias across all outcome domains. Considering the higher-quality studies, evidence of a beneficial effect of HMB supplementation was found in four of four studies for muscle mass, two of two for muscle function, three of three for hospitalization, and five of seven for survival. In contrast, no beneficial effects of HMB on quality of life or body weight was found in two of four and three of five studies, respectively. A limited number of higher-quality studies evaluating the impact of HMB on cancer therapy-related toxicity, inflammation, and tumour response were observed. No serious adverse effects directly related to the nutrition intervention were reported. Although limited, current evidence suggests that HMB supplementation has a beneficial effect on muscle mass and function in patients with cancer. Well-designed trials are needed to further explore the clinical benefit of HMB supplementation in this patient population.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAgedDietary SupplementsHumansMuscle, SkeletalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicValeratesbeta-hydroxyisovaleric acidValeratesCancerHMBMuscle functionMuscle massNutrition interventionβ-Hydroxy β-methylbutyrate

Identifiers

PMID35301826
PMCPMC9178154
OpenAlexW4220913543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.