Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301823›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Targeting MuRF1 by small molecules in a HFpEF rat model improves myocardial diastolic function and skeletal muscle contractility.

Volker Adams, Antje Schauer, Antje Augstein, Virginia Kirchhoff, Runa Draskowski, Anett Jannasch, Keita Goto, Gemma Lyall, Anita Männel, Peggy Barthel and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ZSF1 lean rats - How healthy are they?Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MuRF1 Partners With TRIM72 to Impair Insulin Signaling in Skeletal Muscle Cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeting MuRF1 to Combat Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Cardiac Cachexia: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Post-translational modifications in diabetic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Volker AdamsLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7955-7324
Antje SchauerLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Antje AugsteinLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Virginia KirchhoffLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Runa DraskowskiLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Anett JannaschDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Keita GotoLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Gemma LyallSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anita MännelLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Peggy BarthelLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Norman MangnerLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ephraim B WinzerLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Axel LinkeLaboratory of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, TU Dresden, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Siegfried LabeitMyomedix GmbH, Neckargemünd, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research)European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program 645648Foundation Leducq 13CVD04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout half of heart failure (HF) patients, while having preserved left ventricular function, suffer from diastolic dysfunction (so-called HFpEF). No specific therapeutics are available for HFpEF in contrast to HF where reduced ejection fractions (HFrEF) can be treated pharmacologically. Myocardial titin filament stiffening, endothelial dysfunction, and skeletal muscle (SKM) myopathy are suspected to contribute to HFpEF genesis. We previously described small molecules interfering with MuRF1 target recognition thereby attenuating SKM myopathy and dysfunction in HFrEF animal models. The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of one small molecule (MyoMed-205) in HFpEF and to describe molecular changes elicited by MyoMed-205.

methodsTwenty-week-old female obese ZSF1 rats received the MuRF1 inhibitor MyoMed-205 for 12 weeks; a comparison was made to age-matched untreated ZSF1-lean (healthy) and obese rats as controls. LV (left ventricle) function was assessed by echocardiography and by invasive haemodynamic measurements until week 32. At week 32, SKM and endothelial functions were measured and tissues collected for molecular analyses. Proteome-wide analysis followed by WBs and RT-PCR was applied to identify specific genes and affected molecular pathways. MuRF1 knockout mice (MuRF1-KO) SKM tissues were included to validate MuRF1-specificity.

resultsBy week 32, untreated obese rats had normal LV ejection fraction but augmented E/e' ratios and increased end diastolic pressure and myocardial fibrosis, all typical features of HFpEF. Furthermore, SKM myopathy (both atrophy and force loss) and endothelial dysfunction were detected. In contrast, MyoMed-205 treated rats had markedly improved diastolic function, less myocardial fibrosis, reduced SKM myopathy, and increased SKM function. SKM extracts from MyoMed-205 treated rats had reduced MuRF1 content and lowered total muscle protein ubiquitination. In addition, proteomic profiling identified eight proteins to respond specifically to MyoMed-205 treatment. Five out of these eight proteins are involved in mitochondrial metabolism, dynamics, or autophagy. Consistent with the mitochondria being a MyoMed-205 target, the synthesis of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes I + II was increased in treated rats. MuRF1-KO SKM controls also had elevated mitochondrial complex I and II activities, also suggesting mitochondrial activity regulation by MuRF1.

conclusionsMyoMed-205 improved myocardial diastolic function and prevented SKM atrophy/function in the ZSF1 animal model of HFpEF. Mechanistically, SKM benefited from an attenuated ubiquitin proteasome system and augmented synthesis/activity of proteins of the mitochondrial respiratory chain while the myocardium seemed to benefit from reduced titin modifications and fibrosis.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalSmall Molecule LibrariesTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAnimalsConnectinDiastoleFemaleFibrosisMiceMice, KnockoutMuscular AtrophyMyocardiumRatsConnectinMuscle ProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesTrim63 protein, mouseTrim63 protein, ratTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesDiastolic dysfunctionHFpEFMuRF1Muscle atrophySkeletal muscle dysfunctionZSF1

Identifiers

PMID35301823
PMCPMC9178400
OpenAlexW4220926375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.