Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35301757›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2022

Psychometric validation of a patient-reported experience measure of obstetric racism© (The PREM-OB Scale™ suite).

Emily White VanGompel, Jin-Shei Lai, Dána-Ain Davis, Francesca Carlock, Tamentanefer L Camara, Brianne Taylor, Chakiya Clary, Ashlee M McCorkle-Jamieson, Safyer McKenzie-Sampson, Caryl Gay and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Chicago Neighborhood Context and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Diabetes.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emily White VanGompelDepartments of Family Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-0453
Jin-Shei LaiDepartments of Medical Social Sciences and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Dána-Ain DavisQueens College, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Francesca CarlockNorthShore University HealthSystem (NSUHS) Research Institute, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Tamentanefer L CamaraCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Brianne TaylorCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Chakiya ClaryCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ashlee M McCorkle-JamiesonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Safyer McKenzie-SampsonCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Caryl GayDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6865-6335
Amanda ArmijoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lillie LapeyrolerieDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lavisha SinghQueens College, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Karen A ScottBirthing Cultural Rigor, LLC, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6237-664X

Funding

Supporting Vaginal Birth in Illinois: the Role of Unit CultureK08HS028028 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WHITE VANGOMPEL, EMILY · 2021 to 2024
$581k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal quality improvement lacks valid tools to measure adverse hospital experiences disproportionately impacting Black mothers and birthing people. Measuring and mitigating harm requires using a framework that centers the lived experiences of Black birthing people in evaluating inequitable care, namely, obstetric racism. We sought to develop a valid patient-reported experience measure (PREM) of Obstetric Racism

methodsPROMIS© instrument development standards adapted with cultural rigor methodology. Phase 1 included item pool generation, modified Delphi method, and cognitive interviews. Phase 2 evaluated the item pool using factor analysis and item response theory.

resultsItems were identified or written to cover 7 previously identified theoretical domains. 806 Black mothers and birthing people completed the pilot test. Factor analysis concluded a 3 factor structure with good fit indices (CFI = 0.931-0.977, RMSEA = 0.087-0.10, R

conclusionsThe PREM-OB Scale™ suite is a valid tool to characterize and quantify obstetric racism for use in perinatal improvement initiatives.

Indexed as

RacismFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnairesblack mothersobstetric racismpsychometricsquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35301757
PMCPMC9544169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.